Discrimination and Privacy in the Information Society: Data Mining and Profiling in Large Databases
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717743530 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174014 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Algorithmic Bias: From Discrimination Discovery to Fairness-aware Data Mining
Hajian, S., Bonchi, F., & Castillo, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2945386 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Romei, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2014) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888913000039 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making
Žliobaitė, I. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-017-0506-1 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
de Laat, P. B. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0293-z · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated <scp>decision‐making</scp>
Binns, R. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12358 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Žliobaitė, I., & Custers, B. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9182-5 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationDiscrimination- and privacy-aware patterns
Hajian, S., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Monreale, A., Pedreschi, D., & Giannotti, F. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0393-7 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ustxg · Cited by 512 · see citing works
La Fors, K., Custers, B., & Keymolen, E. (2019) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-019-09503-4 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Custers, B. H. M., Calders, T., Schermer, B. W., & Zarsky, T.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Venue
- Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- ISSN
- 2192-6255 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-6263
- OpenAlex
- W2492995478
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- discrimination, privacy, information society, data collection, data processing, administrative decisions, data ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
