Cited by 127Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Digitalization, Law, and Regulation

Using sensitive personal data may be necessary for avoiding discrimination in data-driven decision models

Open access
Žliobaitė, Indrė, Custers, Bart·2016·Artificial Intelligence and Law

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10506-016-9182-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many of the methods to tackle discrimination in AI systems implicitly assume that organisations hold these sensitive data.

    “Many of the methods to tackle discrimination in AI systems implicitly assume that organisations hold these sensitive data”

    From Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making (2025) · cites this paper as Žliobaitė and Custers 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Žliobaitė, I., & Custers, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Žliobaitė, Indrė
Venue
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Published
2016-05-07
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
183-201
ISSN
  • 0924-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8382
OpenAlex
W2392403817
Cited by
125
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
23.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
algorithmic discrimination, sensitive personal data, data-driven decision making, algorithmic fairness, prediction model, race, data privacy regulation, data minimization, data bias, data mining, personal data protection law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review