The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors,”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Early designs of interactive tutoring aids for teaching and support comprised of rule-based systems mirroring interactions between expert teacher and student (Arroyo et al., 2004; Olney et al., 2012) or between peer companions (Movellan et al., 2009).”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Olney et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
BLOOM, B. S. (1984) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x013006004 · Cited by 2,734
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C., & Reiser, B. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.228.4698.456 · Cited by 699
AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language
Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H. H., Ventura, M., Olney, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195563 · Cited by 567
Self-citationAdvances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Nkambou, R., Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeau, J. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2 · Cited by 388
The Architecture of Why2-Atlas: A Coach for Qualitative Physics Essay Writing
VanLehn, K. A., Jordan, P., Rosé, C. P., Bhembe, D., Böttner, M., Gaydos, A., Makatchev, M., Pappuswamy, U., Ringenberg, M. A., Roque, A., et al. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47987-2_20 · Cited by 230
Mining Collaborative Patterns in Tutorial Dialogues
D’Mello, S. K., Olney, A. M., & Person, N. K. (2010) · Journal of Educational Data Mining · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3554737 · Cited by 65
Self-citationGenerating Concept Map Exercises from Textbooks
Olney, A. M., Cade, W., & Williams, C. (2011) · Cited by 29
Self-citationTutorial Dialog in Natural Language
Olney, A. M., Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_9 · Cited by 23
Self-citationCollaborative Lecturing by Human and Computer Tutors
D’Mello, S. K., Hays, P. A., Williams, C., Cade, W., Brown, J., & Olney, A. M. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_18 · Cited by 21
Self-citationProceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
Tetreault, J., Burstein, J. C., & Leacock, C. (2011) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · Cited by 18
GnuTutor: An Open Source Intelligent Tutoring System Based on AutoTutor
Olney, A. M. (2009) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4320238 · Cited by 10
Self-citationStudent Speech Act Classification Using Machine Learning.
Rasor, T., Olney, A. M., & D’Mello, S. K. (2011) · The Florida AI Research Society · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315697048 · Cited by 1,977
PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework
OECD (2017) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/9789264281820-en · Cited by 623
AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring
Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0029-5 · Cited by 326
Self-citationConversations with AutoTutor Help Students Learn
Graesser, A. C. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4 · Cited by 202
Self-citationRecent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Rus, V., D’Mello, S. K., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2013) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2485 · Cited by 199
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Olney, A. M., D’Mello, S., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Rhodes College (US)
- Venue
- Lecture notes in computer science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 256-261
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W80135617
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- intelligent tutoring systems, high school biology, scaffolding, concept mapping, cloze task, learning gains
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
