Cited by 1,331Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Multiparty Computation from Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption

Open access
Damgård, Ivan, Pastro, Valerio, Smart, Nigel, Zakarias, Sarah·2012·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

We propose a general multiparty computation protocol secure against an active adversary corrupting up to $$n-1$$ of the n players. The protocol may be used to compute securely arithmetic circuits over any finite field $$\mathbb {F}_{p^k}$$ . Our protocol consists of a preprocessing phase that is both independent of the function to be computed and of the inputs, and a much more efficient online phase where the actual computation takes place. The online phase is unconditionally secure and has total computational (and communication) complexity linear in n, the number of players, where earlier work was quadratic in n. Moreover, the work done by each player is only a small constant factor larger than what one would need to compute the circuit in the clear. We show this is optimal for computation in large fields. In practice, for 3 players, a secure 64-bit multiplication can be done in 0.05 ms. Our preprocessing is based on a somewhat homomorphic cryptosystem. We extend a scheme by Brakerski et al., so that we can perform distributed decryption and handle many values in parallel in one ciphertext. The computational complexity of our preprocessing phase is dominated by the public-key operations, we need $$O(n^2/s)$$ operations per secure multiplication where s is a parameter that increases with the security parameter of the cryptosystem. Earlier work in this model needed $$\varOmega (n^2)$$ operations. In practice, the preprocessing prepares a secure 64-bit multiplication for 3 players in about 13 ms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_38

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Byzantine-robust aggregation rules may ensure that the influence of Byzantine workers in any single round is limited, but attackers can couple attacks across rounds, moving weights significantly away from the desired direction and lowering model quality.

    “[133], [70] showed that while the Byzantine-robust aggregation rules may ensure that the influence of the Byzantine workers in any single round is limited, the attackers can couple their attacks across the rounds, moving weights significantly away from the desired direction and thus achieve the goal of lowering the model quality.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damgård, I., Pastro, V., Smart, N., & Zakarias, S.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2012
Pages
643-662
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2402235285
Cited by
1,331
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 17
FWCI
46.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I03126X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
secure multi-party computation, somewhat homomorphic encryption, active adversaries, finite fields, distributed decryption, secure multiplication, linear computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review