The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osmotic Adjustment Under Drought Conditions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Raza, S. H., Athar, H. R., Ashraf, M., & Hameed, A. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.009 · Cited by 219
Cited by
Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0 · Cited by 648
Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement
Obidiegwu, J. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00542 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanders, G. J., & Arndt, S. K.
- Venue
- Plant Responses to Drought Stress
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 199-229
- OpenAlex
- W2242471476
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmotic Adjustment Under Drought Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_8
- The paper
- Sanders, G. J., & Arndt, S. K. (2012). Osmotic Adjustment Under Drought Conditions. Plant Responses to Drought Stress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
