The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement
Open accessAbstract
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is often considered as a drought sensitive crop and its sustainable production is threatened due to frequent drought episodes. There has been much research aiming to understand the physiological, biochemical, and genetic basis of drought tolerance in potato as a basis for improving production under drought conditions. The complex phenotypic response of potato plants to drought is conditioned by the interactive effects of the plant's genotypic potential, developmental stage, and environment. Effective crop improvement for drought tolerance will require the pyramiding of many disparate characters, with different combinations being appropriate for different growing environments. An understanding of the interaction between below ground water uptake by the roots and above ground water loss from the shoot system is essential. The development of high throughput precision phenotyping platforms is providing an exciting new tool for precision screening, which, with the incorporation of innovative screening strategies, can aid the selection and pyramiding of drought-related genes appropriate for specific environments. Outcomes from genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and bioengineering advances will undoubtedly compliment conventional breeding strategies and presents an alternative route toward development of drought tolerant potatoes. This review presents an overview of past research activity, highlighting recent advances with examples from other crops and suggesting future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
(2023) · doi:10.1126/science · Cited by 6,063
Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses
Kershaw, K. A., & Levitt, J. (1973) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3241344 · Cited by 4,753
Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo
Baker, N. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 · Cited by 4,639
Proline: a multifunctional amino acid
Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009 · Cited by 4,317
Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2008021 · Cited by 4,098
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., & Altman, A. (2003) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5 · Cited by 3,678
Plant Responses to Water Stress
Hsiao, T. C. (1973) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511 · Cited by 3,403
Metadata
- Authors
- Obidiegwu, J. E.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 542-542
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1515295086
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 189
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2015.00542
- The paper
- Obidiegwu, J. E. (2015). Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.