The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Broadening the Scope of Nanopublications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“we argued in previous work that the assertion of a nanopublication need not be fully formalized, but we can allow for informal or underspecified assertions (Kuhn et al., 2013)”
From Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications (2016) · cites this paper as Kuhn et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
King, R. D., Rowland, J., Oliver, S. G., Young, M., Aubrey, W., Byrne, E., Liakata, M., Markham, M., Pir, P., Soldatova, L. N., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165620 · Cited by 679
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Carroll, J.J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., Stickler, P.: Named graphs, provenance and trust. In: WWW 2005, pp. 613–622. ACM (2005) · DOI
- Ciccarese, P., Wu, E., Wong, G., Ocana, M., Kinoshita, J., Ruttenberg, A., Clark, T.: The SWAN biomedical discourse ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41(5), 739–751 (2008) · DOI
- Clark, T., Kinoshita, J.: Alzforum and SWAN: The present and future of scientific web communities. Briefings in Bioinformatics 8(3), 163–171 (2007) · DOI
- Everitt, B.S.: Cluster Analysis, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold and Halsted Press (1993)
- Groth, P., Gibson, A., Velterop, J.: The anatomy of a nano-publication. Information Services and Use 30(1), 51–56 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
- Kuhn, T., Krauthammer, M.: Underspecified scientific claims in nanopublications. In: WoLE 2012, pp. 29–32. CEUR-WS (2012)
- Kuhn, T., Royer, L., Fuchs, N.E., Schröder, M.: Improving text mining with controlled natural language: A case study for protein interactions. In: Leser, U., Naumann, F., Eckman, B. (eds.) DILS 2006. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4075, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) · DOI · Paper page
- Mons, B., van Haagen, H., Chichester, C., den Dunnen, J.T., van Ommen, G., van Mulligen, E., Singh, B., Hooft, R., Roos, M., Hammond, J., Kiesel, B., Giardine, B., Velterop, J., Groth, P., Schultes, E.: The value of data. Nature Genetics 43(4), 281–283 (2011) · DOI
- Rector, A.L., Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Rogers, J., Knublauch, H., Stevens, R., Wang, H., Wroe, C.: OWL pizzas: Practical experience of teaching OWL-DL: Common errors & common patterns. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257, pp. 63–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) · DOI
- Seringhaus, M.R., Gerstein, M.B.: Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow’s information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics 8(1), 17 (2007) · DOI
- Soldatova, L.N., King, R.D.: An ontology of scientific experiments. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 3(11), 795–803 (2006) · DOI
- Soldatova, L.N., Rzhetsky, A., King, R.D.: Representation of research hypotheses. J. Biomed Semantics 2(suppl. 2), S9 (2011) · DOI
- Wyner, A., Angelov, K., Barzdins, G., Damljanovic, D., Davis, B., Fuchs, N., Hoefler, S., Jones, K., Kaljurand, K., Kuhn, T., Luts, M., Pool, J., Rosner, M., Schwitter, R., Sowa, J.: On controlled natural languages: Properties and prospects. In: Fuchs, N.E. (ed.) CNL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5972, pp. 281–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications
Kuhn, T., Chichester, C., Krauthammer, M., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Verborgh, R., Giannakopoulos, G., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C., Viglianti, R., & Dumontier, M. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.78 · Cited by 90
Self-citationWijkstra, M., Lek, T., Kuhn, T., Welbers, K., & Steijaert, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 11th Knowledge Capture Conference · doi:10.1145/3460210.3493567 · Cited by 13
Self-citationMenotti, L., Marchesin, S., Giachelle, F., & Silvello, G. (2025) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-025-00431-x · Cited by 5
Provenance-Enhanced Statements in Knowledge Graphs
Vitali, F., & Pasqual, V. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.15246
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, T., Barbano, P. E., Nagy, M. L., & Krauthammer, M.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 487-501
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- 1611-3349
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
