The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships between Password Choices, Perceptions of Risk and Security Expertise
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Unrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
A cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off
Hellman, M. E. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1980.1056220 · Cited by 703
Bonneau, J., Just, M., & Matthews, G. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14577-3_10 · Cited by 580
Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World
Schneier, B. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.1007/b97547 · Cited by 371
Generating and remembering passwords
Brown, A. S., Bracken, E., Zoccoli, S. L., et al. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1014 · Cited by 200
The psychology of password management: a tradeoff between security and convenience
Tam, L., Glassman, M., & Vandenwauver, M. (2009) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290903121386 · Cited by 153
Passwords: If We’re So Smart, Why Are We Still Using Them?
Herley, C., van Oorschot, P. C., & Patrick, A. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03549-4_14 · Cited by 115
Choosing passwords: security and human factors
Gehringer, E. F. (2003) · doi:10.1109/istas.2002.1013839 · Cited by 104
Cyber-Risk Management: Technical and Insurance Controls for Enterprise-Level Security
Siegel, C. A., Sagalow, T. R., & Serritella, P. (2002) · Information Systems Security · doi:10.1201/1086/43322.11.4.20020901/38843.5 · Cited by 40
Napier, R. (2005) · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do You Love Me? Psychological Characteristics of Romance Scam Victims
Whitty, M. T. (2018) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0729 · Cited by 177
“Research has found a clear distinction between experts and nonexperts regarding basic security behaviors, such as patching and updating software.(19) Given that most romance scams involve the Internet, it is hypothesized that people who believe they know little about cybersecurity are more likely to be victims of roma…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Creese, S., Hodges, D., Jamison-Powell, S., & Whitty, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 80-89
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1537665415
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J004995/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- password choice, risk perception, security expertise, human factors in security, internet security, user vulnerability, security attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review