Cited by 4,999Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsRisk Perception and Management

Unrealistic optimism about future life events

Weinstein, Neil D.·1980·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two studies investigated the tendency of people to be unrealistically optimistic about future life events. In Study 1, 258 college students estimated how much their own chances of experiencing 42 events differed from the chances of their classmates. Overall, they rated their own chances to be above average for posi-tive events and below average for negative events, ps<.001. Cognitive and motivational considerations led to predictions that degree of desirability, per-ceived probability, personal experience, perceived controllability, and stereotype salience would influence the amount of optimistic bias evoked by different events. All predictions were supported, although the pattern of effects differed for positive and negative events. Study 2 tested the idea that people are un-realistically optimistic because they focus on factors that improve their own chances of achieving desirable outcomes and fail to realize that others may have just as many factors in their favor. Students listed the factors that they thought influenced their own chances of experiencing eight future events. When such lists were read by a second group of students, the amount of unrealistic opti-mism shown by this second group for the same eight events decreased signifi-cantly, although it was not eliminated. According to popular belief, people tend to think they are invulnerable. They expect others to be victims of misfortune, not them-selves. Such ideas imply not merely a hopeful outlook on life, but an error in judgment that can be labeled unrealistic optimism. It is usually impossible to demonstrate that an individual's optimistic expectations about the future are unrealistic. An individual might be quite correct in asserting that his or her chances of experiencing a negative event are less than average. On a group basis, however, it is relatively easy to test for an optimistic bias. If all people claim their changes of ex-periencing a negative event are less than

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the optimism/pessimism classification, there seems to be a bias toward optimism, typically expressed in people believing they will live longer than average, underestimating divorce chances, health problems and risks such as car accidents.

    “In the optimism/pessimism classification, there seems to be a bias toward optimism, typically expressed in people believing that they will live longer than average, underestimating divorce chances, health problems and risks such as car accidents (Weinstein, 1980).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinstein, N. D.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Weinstein, Neil D.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1980-11
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
806-820
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2145046219
Cited by
4,999
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 200 · 2021: 226 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 180 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 176 · 2015: 227 · 2014: 201 · 2013: 195 · 2012: 222
FWCI
20.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
optimism bias, self-other differences, perceived probability, perceived controllability, positive and negative events, self-protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review