Cited by 253Security and Verification in ComputingPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Non-invasive Spoofing Attacks for Anti-lock Braking Systems

Shoukry, Yasser, Martin, Paul, Tabuada, Paulo, Srivastava, Mani·2013·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-40349-1_4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoukry, Y., Martin, P., Tabuada, P., & Srivastava, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2013
Pages
55-72
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W185142374
Cited by
253
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
anti-lock braking system, physical layer attacks, sensor spoofing, wheel speed sensors, electromagnetic interference, magnetic sensors, automotive cybersecurity, non-invasive attacks, attack detection evasion, vehicle safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review