The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pareto optimization has emerged as the preferred method for MPO, as it allows for the identification of trade-offs between objectives, leading to the discovery of non-dominant solutions (101).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fonseca, C. M., & Fleming, P. J. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.650319 · Cited by 1,241
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N. M., & Valipour, A. (2015) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2015.1075139 · Cited by 1,223
Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-L. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8 · Cited by 1,138
Self-citationA new approach for multiple objective decision making
Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., & Liu, T.-Y. (1993) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-v · Cited by 1,035
Self-citationIntegrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods
Jankowski, P. L. (1995) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/02693799508902036 · Cited by 748
A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization
Kursawe, F. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/bfb0029752 · Cited by 599
Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys
Ehrgott, M., & Gandibleux, X. (2002) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/b101915 · Cited by 548
Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., & Öztayşi, B. (2015) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325 · Cited by 542
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622016300019 · Cited by 493
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm test suites
Veldhuizen, D. A. V., & Lamont, G. B. (1999) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/298151.298382 · Cited by 447
A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection
Shyur, H., & Shih, H.-S. (2006) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018 · Cited by 427
“a constraint set, so that the most satisfactory objectives can be obtained [32].”
BackgroundShee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.005 · Cited by 448
A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design
Kheiri, F. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.080 · Cited by 429
The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Weraduwage, S. M., Chen, J., Anozie, F. C., Morales, A., Weise, S. E., & Sharkey, T. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00167 · Cited by 422
Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming
Pishvaee, M. S., & Razmi, J. (2011) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.007 · Cited by 397
How Should Robustness Be Defined for Water Systems Planning under Change?
Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M., Zeff, H. B., & Characklis, G. W. (2015) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000509 · Cited by 395
A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection
Arenas‐Parra, M., Bilbao‐Terol, A., & Urı́a, M. V. R. (2001) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00298-8 · Cited by 304
A multi-objective train scheduling model and solution
Ghoseiri, K., Szidarovszky, F., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2004) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2004.02.004 · Cited by 298
Deb, K., & Gupta, S. (2011) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/0305215x.2010.548863 · Cited by 297
Credibility-based fuzzy mathematical programming model for green logistics design under uncertainty
Pishvaee, M. S., Torabi, S. A., & Razmi, J. (2011) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.028 · Cited by 292
An energy-efficient multi-objective optimization for flexible job-shop scheduling problem
Mokhtari, H., & Hasani, A. (2017) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.004 · Cited by 285
Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues
Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antuchevičienė, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2016.1237302 · Cited by 295
Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Noninteractive Approaches
Miettinen, K. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_1 · Cited by 270
An interactive desirability function method to multiresponse optimization
Jeong, I., & Kim, K.-J. (2008) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.018 · Cited by 244
Stochastic Dynamic Pricing for EV Charging Stations With Renewable Integration and Energy Storage
Luo, C., Huang, Y.-F., & Gupta, V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2696493 · Cited by 273
“8 is a Pareto optimum in which it is impossible to increase any one individual objective without decreasing at least one of the other objectives [41].”
BackgroundMethodA distributed Cooperative coevolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization
Tan, K. C., Yang, Y., & Goh, C.-K. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2005.860762 · Cited by 232
Extensions of TOPSIS for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems
Abo-Sinna, M. A., & Amer, A. (2004) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.087 · Cited by 236
Supplier Selection Using Multi‐objective Programming: A Decision Support System Approach
Weber, C. A., & Ellram, L. M. (1993) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600039310038161 · Cited by 235
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236
Pries-Heje, & Baskerville, R. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148870 · Cited by 250
Ramos, T. R. P., Gomes, M. I., & Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P. (2013) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.11.006 · Cited by 230
Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization
Mattson, C. A., & Messac, A. (2004) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1023/b:opte.0000048538.35456.45 · Cited by 229
Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive Approaches
Miettinen, K., Ruiz, F., & Wierzbicki, A. P. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_2 · Cited by 227
Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization
Miettinen, K., & Mäkelä, M. M. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.052 · Cited by 223
Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2015) · Transport · doi:10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517 · Cited by 229
Multi-objective techno-economic-environmental optimisation of electric vehicle for energy services
Das, R., Wang, Y., Putrus, G. A., Kötter, R., Marzband, M., Herteleer, B., & Warmerdam, J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113965 · Cited by 221
A bicriterion shortest path algorithm
Clı́maco, J., & Martins, E. Q. V. (1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90205-3 · Cited by 219
COMMENTS ON “MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) METHODS IN ECONOMICS: AN OVERVIEW”
Liou, J. J. H., & Tzeng, G. (2012) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/20294913.2012.753489 · Cited by 227
A goal programming procedure for fuzzy multiobjective linear fractional programming problem
Pal, B. B., Moitra, B. N., & Maulik, U. (2003) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00374-3 · Cited by 208
A Survey on Modeling and Optimizing Multi-Objective Systems
Cho, J.-H., Wang, Y., Chen, I.-R., Chan, K., & Swami, A. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2698366 · Cited by 208
“In Figure 3, we explain the decision process based on the three stages [98], [205].”
MethodPareto navigation—algorithmic foundation of interactive multi-criteria IMRT planning
Monz, M., Küfer, K., Bortfeld, T. R., et al. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/011 · Cited by 203
Blood supply chain network design considering blood group compatibility under uncertainty
Zahiri, B., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1262563 · Cited by 195
A Model for the Multiperiod Multiobjective Power Generation Expansion Problem
Ceciliano-Meza, J. L., Yildirim, M. B., & Masud, A. S. M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2007.895178 · Cited by 193
Self-citationAn interactive fuzzy programming system
Werners, B. (1987) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(87)90105-9 · Cited by 193
Madjid Tavana, D., Li, Z. S., Mobin, M., Komaki, M., & Teymourian, E. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.007 · Cited by 190
“20 TOPSIS was originally introduced by Hwang and Masud (1979). The basic mechanism of this approach is to calculate the distance from each alternative to a positive ideal solution (PIS) and a negative ideal solution (NIS) that are defined in n-dimensional space, where n is the number of”
BackgroundGonzález, J., Rojas, I., Ortega, J., Pomares, H., Fernandez, J., & Díaz, A. F. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.820657 · Cited by 188
Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I—continuous case
Shin, W. S., & Ravindran, A. (1991) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(91)90046-t · Cited by 182
Khalili‐Damghani, K., Abtahi, A., & Madjid Tavana, D. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.009 · Cited by 182
“Under this consideration, the methods for solving MODM problems have been systematically classified into four classes [9].”
BackgroundMethodMultiple objective ant colony optimisation
Angus, D. J., & Woodward, C. J. (2008) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-008-0022-4 · Cited by 179
Yue, D., Kim, M. A., & You, F. (2013) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc400080x · Cited by 176
Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling
Huang, J. P., Poh, K. L., & Ang, B. W. (1995) · Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(95)00036-g · Cited by 173
Function-transformation methods for multi-objective optimization
Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2005) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/03052150500114289 · Cited by 171
Heuristic-Based Shiftable Loads Optimal Management in Smart Micro-Grids
Graditi, G., Silvestre, M. L. D., Gallea, R., & Sanseverino, E. R. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2331000 · Cited by 176
Moffett, A. S., & Sarkar, S. (2006) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00202.x · Cited by 167
Using Agent-Based Modeling for Water Resources Planning and Management
Berglund, E. Z. (2015) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000544 · Cited by 172
Wang, H., Olhofer, M., & Jin, Y. (2017) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-017-0053-9 · Cited by 160
Interactive Multiobjective Optimization: A Review of the State-of-the-Art
Xin, B., Chen, L., Chen, J., Ishibuchi, H., Hirota, K., & Liu, B. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2856832 · Cited by 167
“Depending on the stage in which the DM takes part in the solution process, multiobjective optimization methods can be divided into the following three classes [3], [4].”
BackgroundYoon, K., & Hwang, C.-L. (1985) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207548508904712 · Cited by 154
Self-citationNémeth, B., Molnár, A., Bozóki, S., Wijaya, K. E., Inotai, A., Campbell, J. D., & Kaló, Z. (2019) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0102 · Cited by 150
Interactive bundle-based method for nondifferentiable multiobjeective optimization: nimbus§
Miettinen, K., & Mäkelä, M. M. (1995) · Optimization · doi:10.1080/02331939508844109 · Cited by 148
Multiobjective transportation network design and routing problems: Taxonomy and annotation
Current, J. R., & Marsh, M. T. (1993) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90140-i · Cited by 148
Game theory approach for multiobjective structural optimization
Rao, S. S. (1987) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/0045-7949(87)90223-9 · Cited by 148
Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems
Miettinen, K. (2012) · OR Spectrum · doi:10.1007/s00291-012-0297-0 · Cited by 143
Multi-Objective Reconfiguration of Radial Distribution Systems Using Reliability Indices
Paterakis, N. G., Mazza, A., Santos, S. F. F., Erdinç, O., Chicco, G., Bakirtzis, A. G., & Catalào, J. P. S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2425801 · Cited by 141
Gong, J., & You, F. (2014) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.14504 · Cited by 141
Melachrinoudis, E., & Min, H. (2000) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00166-6 · Cited by 141
Min, H., & Melachrinoudis, E. (1999) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00036-x · Cited by 137
Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the Internet
Miettinen, K., & Mäkelä, M. M. (2000) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00115-x · Cited by 136
Yue, D., Slivinsky, M., Sumpter, J., & You, F. (2014) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie403882v · Cited by 136
Braga, A. S. D., & Saraiva, J. T. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2005.852121 · Cited by 133
Zhang, G., & Lü, J. (2003) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/b:grup.0000004197.04668.cf · Cited by 132
Sustainable supply chain optimisation: An industrial case study
Zhang, Q., Shah, N., Wassick, J. M., Helling, R. K., & van Egerschot, P. (2014) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.05.002 · Cited by 134
Concepts, Theory, and Techniques PRINCIPLES OF MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION*
Rosenthal, R. E. (1985) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1985.tb01479.x · Cited by 131
Arampantzi, C., & Minis, I. E. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.164 · Cited by 130
Multiobjective design of transportation networks: Taxonomy and annotation
Current, J. R., & Min, H. (1986) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90180-3 · Cited by 130
Wen, C., & Lee, C. (1998) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/97wr02943 · Cited by 127
Palermo, G., Silvano, C., & Zaccaria, V. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2009.2028681 · Cited by 126
Using Evolutionary Algorithms to Generate Alternatives for Multiobjective Site-Search Problems
Xiao, N., Bennett, D. A., & Armstrong, M. P. (2002) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a34109 · Cited by 130
Immune network simulations in multicriterion design
Yoo, J., & Hajela, P. (1999) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01195983 · Cited by 124
Some Methods for Nonlinear Multi-objective Optimization
Miettinen, K. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44719-9_1 · Cited by 123
Ruíz, A. B. M., Saborido, R., & Luque, M. (2014) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-014-0214-y · Cited by 119
Luque, M., Miettinen, K., Eskelinen, P., et al. (2007) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.06.001 · Cited by 117
Value-Added Chemicals from Microalgae: Greener, More Economical, or Both?
Gong, J., & You, F. (2014) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc500683w · Cited by 118
Appropriate choice of aggregation operators in fuzzy decision support systems
Beliakov, G., & Warren, J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.971696 · Cited by 115
Interactive Particle Swarm: A Pareto-Adaptive Metaheuristic to Multiobjective Optimization
Agrawal, S., Dashora, Y., Tiwari, M. K., et al. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2007.914767 · Cited by 115
Computing the Nondominated Surface in Tri-Criterion Portfolio Selection
Hirschberger, M., Steuer, R. E., Utz, S., Wimmer, M., & Qi, Y. (2013) · Operational Research · doi:10.1287/opre.1120.1140 · Cited by 115
Ullah, I., Aslam, B., Shah, S. H. I. A., et al. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11081265 · Cited by 114
Warranty Economic Decision Models: A Summary and Some Suggested Directions for Future Research
Thomas, M. U., & Rao, S. S. (1999) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.47.6.807 · Cited by 112
Interactive multiple objective programming subject to flexible constraints
Werners, B. (1987) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(87)90043-9 · Cited by 113
Problem Structuring and Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2010) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5904-1_8 · Cited by 136
A fast hypervolume driven selection mechanism for many-objective optimisation problems
Rostami, S., & Neri, F. (2016) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2016.12.002 · Cited by 110
Lee, D., Jeong, I., & Kim, K. (2018) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.2258 · Cited by 109
A multiobjective optimization approach for location‐allocation of clinics
Beheshtifar, S., & Alimohammadi, A. (2014) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.12088 · Cited by 107
Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework
Fu, G., & Frangopol, D. M. (1990) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/0167-4730(90)90066-x · Cited by 106
Zhu, X., Meng, X., & Zhang, M. (2021) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/jcem.2021.15260 · Cited by 125
Local Feature Selection for Data Classification
Armanfard, N., Reilly, J. P., & Komeili, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2478471 · Cited by 103
“1 1TfðiÞ a: ( (6) There are several ways to re-configure a multi-objective problem into a standard form [34], [37], [38] with a single objective function; e.”
BackgroundKhalili‐Damghani, K., Sadi‐Nezhad, S., & Tavana, M. (2013) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.05.005 · Cited by 100
A spatial decision aid: A multicriterion evaluation approach
Laaribi, A., Chevallier, J. J., & Martel, J. (1996) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/s0198-9715(97)00002-1 · Cited by 100
Game theory approach for the integrated design of structures and controls
Rao, S. S., Venkayya, V. B., & Khot, N. S. (1988) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.9916 · Cited by 100
Han, R., Tang, B.-J., Fan, J., Liu, L.-C., & Wei, Y. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.001 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M.
- Affiliations
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1979
- ISSN
- 0075-8442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233757421
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- multi-objective decision making, computational methods, multi-objective optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review