The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pareto optimization has emerged as the preferred method for MPO, as it allows for the identification of trade-offs between objectives, leading to the discovery of non-dominant solutions (101).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Sensitivity analysis in fuzzy multiobjective linear fractional programming problem
Gupta, P., & Bhatia, D. (2001) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00164-5 · Cited by 30
Time-cost trade-off via optimal control theory in Markov PERT networks
Azaron, A., Katagiri, H., & Sakawa, M. (2007) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-006-0149-x · Cited by 30
Khalili‐Damghani, K., Nojavan, M., & Tavana, M. (2013) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.01.014 · Cited by 30
“Under this consideration, the methods for solving MODM problems have been systematically classified into four classes by Hwang and Masud [23].”
BackgroundMethodXidonas, P., & Mavrotas, G. (2012) · European Journal of Finance · doi:10.1080/1351847x.2012.733718 · Cited by 30
Constructing the set of efficient objective values in multiple objective linear programs
Dauer, J. P., & Saleh, O. A. (1990) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90011-y · Cited by 30
Priam, an interactive program for chosing among multiple attribute alternatives
Lévine, P., & Pomerol, J. (1986) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90091-3 · Cited by 30
Musso, A., & Rothengatter, W. (2012) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.001 · Cited by 29
A goal programming based energy efficient resource allocation in data centers
Khan, S. U., & Min‐Allah, N. (2011) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-011-0611-7 · Cited by 29
Mirhedayatian, M., Jafarian, M., Adnani, S., et al. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4856-6 · Cited by 29
Gong, M., Jiang, X., & Li, H. (2016) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-016-5552-0 · Cited by 27
Training neural networks with a multi-objective sliding mode control algorithm
Costa, M. A., Braga, A. P., de Menezes, B. R., et al. (2003) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(02)00697-5 · Cited by 29
“Within the Pareto set an objective cannot be decreased without increasing the other [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe multiple linear quadratic gaussian problem
Koussoulas, N. T., & Leondes, C. T. (1986) · International Journal of Control · doi:10.1080/00207178608933470 · Cited by 29
Interactive solution to multiobjective optimization problems
Díaz, A. (1987) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1002/nme.1620241005 · Cited by 29
Khan, S. U. (2009) · IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference · doi:10.1109/pccc.2009.5403860 · Cited by 28
A Sequential Quadratic Programming Method for Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems
Ansary, M. A. T., & Panda, G. (2020) · Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s12190-020-01359-y · Cited by 28
Chen, X., Hao, X., Lin, H. W., et al. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL) · doi:10.1109/ical.2010.5585316 · Cited by 28
SIFT flow based genetic fisher vector feature for kinship verification
Puthenputhussery, A., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2016) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7532894 · Cited by 28
Prototype Discovery Using Quality-Diversity
Hagg, A., Asteroth, A., & Bäck, T. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_40 · Cited by 28
Multiple Criteria Optimization; A State of the Art Review
Chankong, V., Haimes, Y. Y., Thadathil, J., et al. (1985) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46536-9_3 · Cited by 28
Ruiz, F., Luque, M., & Miettinen, K. (2011) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0831-x · Cited by 28
Designer’s Preferences and Multi—objective Preliminary Design Processes
Cvetković, D., & Parmee, I. C. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0519-0_20 · Cited by 28
Modelling financial decisions in construction firms
Lam, K. C., & Runeson, G. (1999) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461999371204 · Cited by 28
Some characterizations of the optimal solutions of a vector optimization problem
Jahn, J. (1985) · OR Spectrum · doi:10.1007/bf01719756 · Cited by 28
Optimization of actively controlled structures using goal programming techniques
Rao, S. S., Venkayya, V. B., & Khot, N. S. (1988) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1002/nme.1620260113 · Cited by 28
Rostami, S., O’Reilly, D., Shenfield, A., et al. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.031 · Cited by 27
“For example, the goal-attainment method [18] and the weighted-sum method [24] both only provide single solutions to the optimisation problem - thus failing to provide a diverse distribution of solutions.”
MethodIgnorance‐aware safety and reliability analysis: A heuristic approach
Yazdi, M. (2019) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.2597 · Cited by 27
Combining Multiobjective Optimization and Cluster Analysis to Study Vocal Fold Functional Morphology
Palaparthi, A., Riede, T., & Titze, I. R. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2319194 · Cited by 27
Ekel, P., Menezes, M., & Neto, F. S. (2007) · Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems · doi:10.1016/j.nahs.2006.04.005 · Cited by 27
Multiobjective modelling for regional agricultural planning: Case study in Tunisia
Siskos, Y., Despotis, D. K., & Ghediri, M. (1994) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90404-9 · Cited by 27
D-STEM: a modified step method with desirability function concept
Jeong, I., & Kim, K.-J. (2004) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.05.006 · Cited by 27
New Algorithms For Multi Objective Shortest Path Problem
Sastry, V. N., Janakiraman, T. N., & Mohideen, S. I. (2003) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/bf03398701 · Cited by 27
Methodology for Environmental Risk Assessment of Industrial Nonroutine Releases
Stefanis, S. K., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (1997) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie9607816 · Cited by 27
Interactive Multiple Objective Decision Making: A Bibliography (1965–1988)
Aksoy, Y. (1990) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/eb028065 · Cited by 27
Charalambous, C. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/31.90398 · Cited by 27
Shabani-Naeeni, F., & Yaghin, R. G. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107406 · Cited by 26
Optimal Scheduled-Maintenance Policy Based on Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making
Hwang, C. L., Tillman, F. A., Wei, W., et al. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.1979.5220654 · Cited by 26
Self-citationMartínez‐Frutos, J., & Herrero‐Perez, D. (2018) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.05.003 · Cited by 26
Sustainability SI: Bikeway Network Design Model for Recreational Bicycling in Scenic Areas
Lin, J., & Liao, R.-Y. (2014) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-014-9245-7 · Cited by 26
Fattahi, A., & Türkay, M. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.026 · Cited by 25
Cajot, S., Schüler, N., Peter, M., Koch, A., & Marechal, F. M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in ICT · doi:10.3389/fict.2018.00032 · Cited by 24
Designing pharmaceutical supply chain networks with perishable items considering congestion
Rekabi, S., Ghodratnama, A., & Azaron, A. (2021) · Operational Research · doi:10.1007/s12351-021-00674-x · Cited by 25
“To further investigate these two methods, the reader is referred to (Zeleny and Cochrane, 1973; Zeleny, 1974; Hwang and Masud, 1979; Zeleny, 1982).”
MethodConnections between fuzzy theory, simulated annealing, and convex duality
Richardt, J., Karl, F., & Müller, C. (1998) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00301-6 · Cited by 25
Lee, S. M., & Eom, H. B. (1990) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/bf01062821 · Cited by 25
Fuzzy approaches for multiple criteria linear fractional optimization: A comment
Dutta, D., Rao, J. R., & Tiwari, R. N. (1993) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(93)90381-q · Cited by 25
Production planning & scheduling
Foote, B. L., Ravindran, A., & Lashine, S. H. (1988) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/0360-8352(88)90075-7 · Cited by 25
A comparison of two interactive mcdm procedures
Reeves, G. R., & Gonzalez, J. J. (1989) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(89)90385-8 · Cited by 25
Distributed computation of Pareto solutions inn-player games
Verkama, M., Ehtamo, H., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1996) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf02592144 · Cited by 25
An MOLP based procedure for finding efficient units in DEA models
Lotfı, F. H., Noora, A. A., Jahanshahloo, G. R., et al. (2008) · Central European Journal of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10100-008-0071-1 · Cited by 24
Design Optimization Using Game Theory
Smirnov, D. S., & Golkar, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2019.2897086 · Cited by 24
Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Deng, Y., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2959217 · Cited by 24
Soltanifar, M., & Shahghobadi, S. (2012) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2012.10.003 · Cited by 24
Meta Decision Problems in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Hanne, T. (1999) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5025-9_6 · Cited by 24
Evolution program for nonlinear goal programming
Zheng, D. W., Gen, M., & Ida, K. (1996) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0360-8352(96)00262-8 · Cited by 24
Multiobjective Optimization by Decision Diagrams
Bergman, D., & Ciré, A. A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44953-1_6 · Cited by 24
Decision Making in Ill-Structured Environments and with Multiple Criteria
Zimmermann, H.-J. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_7 · Cited by 24
Solution method for partitioning students into groups
Miyaji, I., Ohno, K., & Mine, H. (1988) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(88)90256-1 · Cited by 24
An interactive goal programming method for non-linear multiple-criteria decision-making problems
Weistroffer, H. R. (1983) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(83)90006-0 · Cited by 24
A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Software Selection Framework
Yan, L., & Thomas, M. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.141 · Cited by 23
Dividing rectangles attack multi-objective optimization
Al-Dujaili, A., & Suresh, S. (2016) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2016.7744246 · Cited by 23
Amrit, A., Leifsson, L., & Koziel, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Aircraft · doi:10.2514/1.c035500 · Cited by 23
Yan, X., Qiao, M., Li, J., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.87 · Cited by 23
Eco-Physic: Eco-Physical design initiative for very large databases
Roukh, A., Bellatreche, L., Bouarar, S., et al. (2017) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2017.01.003 · Cited by 23
Multi-criteria Evaluation of Bran Use to Promote Circularity in the Cereal Production Chain
Grippo, V., Romano, S., & Vastola, A. (2019) · Natural Resources Research · doi:10.1007/s11053-019-09457-w · Cited by 23
Budzinski, M., Cavalett, O., Nitzsche, R., & Strømman, A. H. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12857 · Cited by 23
“To carry out a multi-objective optimization, several approaches are available (Hwang & Masud, 1979).”
MethodBurden Surface Decision Using MODE With TOPSIS in Blast Furnace Ironmkaing
Li, Y., Li, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, S., & Yin, Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2974882 · Cited by 23
A quantum multi-objective optimization algorithm based on harmony search method
Hesar, A. S., Kamel, S. R., & Houshmand, M. (2021) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-021-05799-x · Cited by 23
Multiobjective Stochastic Linear Programming with Incomplete Information: A General Methodology
Urli, B., & Nadeau, R. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2111-5_8 · Cited by 23
A solution of vehicle routing problems in a multiple objective environment
Park, Y.-B., & Koelling, C. P. (1986) · Engineering Costs and Production Economics · doi:10.1016/0167-188x(86)90006-6 · Cited by 23
Pareto optima of isostatic trusses
Koski, J., & Silvennoinen, R. (1982) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/0045-7825(82)90008-1 · Cited by 23
Master production scheduling: a multiple-objective linear programming approach
GONZALEZ, J. J., & Reeves, G. R. (1983) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207548308942390 · Cited by 23
Multistage Heuristic Approach for Solving Infrastructure Investment Decision Problems
Hsieh, T.-Y., & Liu, H. (1997) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(1997)3:4(134 · Cited by 23
A Broad and Narrow Approach to Interactive Evolutionary Design – An Aircraft Design Example
Bandte, O., & Malinchik, S. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24855-2_102 · Cited by 23
Automated selection of mathematical software
Lucks, M., & Gladwell, I. (1992) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/128745.128747 · Cited by 23
Consequential LCA and LCC using linear programming: an illustrative example of biorefineries
Budzinski, M., Sisca, M., & Thrän, D. (2019) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-019-01650-6 · Cited by 22
Javid, N., Khalili‐Damghani, K., Makui, A., et al. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113266 · Cited by 22
An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience
Kungwalsong, K., Mendoza, A., Kamath, V., Pazhani, S., & Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04542-5 · Cited by 16
“Herein, we propose a fuzzy solution method based on the 2-constraint method (Hwang & Masud, 1979).”
MethodXidonas, P., Doukas, H., Mavrotas, G., et al. (2015) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1820-x · Cited by 22
Işık, B., & Kentli, A. (2009) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-009-1927-9 · Cited by 22
Behnamian, J., Zandieh, M., & Ghomi, S. M. T. F. (2010) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-010-0673-0 · Cited by 22
Augmented ε-constraint method in multiobjective staff scheduling problem: a case study
Sadjadi, S. J., Heidari, M., & Esboei, A. A. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5352-8 · Cited by 22
Calfa, B. A., Agarwal, A., Bury, S. J., et al. (2015) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01273 · Cited by 22
Dinda, S., Ghosh, S., & Chatterjee, N. D. (2018) · Spatial Information Research · doi:10.1007/s41324-018-0223-x · Cited by 22
Using General Fuzzy Number to Handle Uncertainty and Imprecision in Group Decision-Making
Zhang, G., & Lü, J. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07950-8_4 · Cited by 22
Population-Based Ant Colony Optimisation for Multi-objective Function Optimisation
Angus, D. J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76931-6_21 · Cited by 22
A cooperative coevolutionary algorithm for multiobjective particle swarm optimization
Tan, C. H., Goh, C.-K., Tan, K. C., et al. (2007) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2007.4424878 · Cited by 22
Régnier, J., Sareni, B., & Roboam, X. (2005) · COMPEL The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1108/03321640510598157 · Cited by 22
Locating Self-Collection Points for Last-Mile Logistics Using Public Transport Data
Wu, H., Shao, D., & Ng, W. S. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18038-0_39 · Cited by 22
Malakooti, B. B. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.21604 · Cited by 22
A restricted class of multiobjective linear fractional programming problems
Dutta, D., Rao, J. R., & Tiwari, R. N. (1993) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)90191-o · Cited by 22
Klein, G. L., Moskowitz, H., & Ravindran, A. (1986) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800330212 · Cited by 22
Managing Cognitive and Mixed-motive Conflicts in Concurrent Engineering
Ramesh, B., & Sengupta, K. C. (1994) · Concurrent Engineering · doi:10.1177/1063293x9400200308 · Cited by 22
A Constraint Method in Nonlinear Multi-Objective Optimization
Eichfelder, G. (2009) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85646-7_1 · Cited by 21
Lee, D., Kim, S., & Byun, J. (2020) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.2666 · Cited by 21
Musonda, F., Millinger, M., & Thrän, D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127465 · Cited by 21
Das, A., & Lee, G. M. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9151757 · Cited by 21
Wine Supply Chain Network Configuration under a Water Footprint Cap
Aivazidou, E., Aidonis, D., Tsolakis, N., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159494 · Cited by 21
A SIMPLIFIED MULTI‐OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR CANAL SCHEDULING
Peng, S., Wang, Y., Khan, S. B. U. Z., et al. (2011) · Irrigation and Drainage · doi:10.1002/ird.654 · Cited by 21
Linear physical programming for production planning optimization
Maria, A. M. R., Mattson, C. A., Ismail-Yahaya, A., et al. (2003) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/0305215031000078401 · Cited by 21
“Charnes and Cooper, and numerous other researchers, have made major contributions to the development of Linear Goal Programming (LGP) [1–3, 6, 10–12, 15, 17, 28].”
BackgroundCanha, L. N., Ekel, P., Queiroz, J. M., et al. (2007) · Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications · doi:10.1002/nla.520 · Cited by 21
“Their solution and, therefore, development of multicriteria methods is carried out in the following directions [7–9]: scalarization techniques; imposing constraints on criteria; utility function method, goal programming; and using the principle of guaranteed result.”
MethodA bi˗objective hub location-allocation model considering congestion
Ghodratnama, A., Arbabi, H., & Azaron, A. (2018) · Operational Research · doi:10.1007/s12351-018-0404-3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M.
- Affiliations
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1979
- ISSN
- 0075-8442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233757421
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- multi-objective decision making, computational methods, multi-objective optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review