The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pareto optimization has emerged as the preferred method for MPO, as it allows for the identification of trade-offs between objectives, leading to the discovery of non-dominant solutions (101).”
From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Kursawe and ZDT functions optimization using hybrid micro genetic algorithm (HMGA)
Lim, W. J., Jambek, A. B., & Neoh, S. C. (2015) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1767-5 · Cited by 21
A decision support methodology for stochastic multi-criteria linear programming using spreadsheets
Novak, D. C., & Ragsdale, C. T. (2003) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(02)00130-6 · Cited by 21
“While this approach works well in theory [9,13,15], in practice it can be very difficult to elicit and model a DM’s true utility function accurately.”
BackgroundMulti-objective decision-aid tool for pavement management
Meneses, S., Ferreira, A., & Collop, A. C. (2012) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport · doi:10.1680/tran.10.00026 · Cited by 21
A multi-criteria methodology for optimising road investments
Odoki, J. B., Graziano, A. D., & Akena, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport · doi:10.1680/tran.12.00053 · Cited by 21
Multiple-criterion control: a convex programming approach
Carvalho, J. R. H., & Ferreira, P. A. V. (1995) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(94)00178-l · Cited by 21
Interactive multicriteria linear programming: An extension of the method of Zionts and Wallenius
Ramesh, R., Karwan, M. H., & Zionts, S. (1989) · Naval Research Logistics (NRL) · doi:10.1002/1520-6750(198906)36:3 · Cited by 21
Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Radial Basis Function Neural Network Design
Yen, G. G. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-33019-4_10 · Cited by 21
Developing Model Strings for Model Managers
Klein, G. L. (1986) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1986.11517765 · Cited by 21
Decentralized throughput maximizing policies for deadline-constrained wireless networks
Singh, R., & Kumar, P. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.2015.7402803 · Cited by 20
“ckets delivered to its destination node perunit time, and our goal is to design decentralized scheduling policies that maximize the total throughput of the network. We use the scalarization principle [6], and consider a weighted throughput of all flows, whose maximum value will be one point on the Pareto frontier of th…”
BackgroundTask-based visual analytics for interactive multiobjective optimization
Hakanen, J., Miettinen, K., & Matković, K. (2020) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2020.1768809 · Cited by 20
“Appropriate methods are needed (see e.g. Hwang and Masud (1979); Miettinen (1999)) to solve these multiobjective optimization problems.”
MethodGenetic Algorithm for Optimization of Infrastructure Investment Under Time‐Resource Constraints
Hsieh, T.-Y., & Liu, H. (2004) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00348.x · Cited by 20
NAUTILUS framework: towards trade-off-free interaction in multiobjective optimization
Miettinen, K., & Ruiz, F. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-015-0786-0 · Cited by 19
Chatzikonstantinou, I., & Sariyildiz, I. S. (2017) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.007 · Cited by 20
Marques, S., Bushenkov, V. A., Lotov, A. V., et al. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12091244 · Cited by 20
Hatami‐Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Gholami, K., et al. (2014) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-014-0559-x · Cited by 20
Khanduzi, R., Peyghami, M. R., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.08.056 · Cited by 20
MULTICUBE: Multi-Objective Design Space Exploration of Multi-Core Architectures
Silvano, C., Fornaciari, W., Palermo, G., et al. (2011) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1488-5_4 · Cited by 20
An interactive method for multiple-objective mathematical programming problems
Shin, W. S., & Ravindran, A. (1991) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf00940069 · Cited by 20
Fuzzy set based multiobjective allocation of resources and its applications
Ekel, P., Martins, C. A. P. D. S., Pereira, J., et al. (2006) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.013 · Cited by 20
Stochastic modelling and optimization for environmental management
Pintér, J. D. (1991) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/bf02204868 · Cited by 20
A MULTIOBJECTIVE INTERACTIVE SEQUENTIAL HYBRID OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR DESIGN DECISION MAKING
Azarm, S., & Narayanan, S. (2000) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/03052150008941310 · Cited by 20
Information System for Risks, Costs, and Benefits of Infrastructure Improvement Projects
Baker, J. A., & Lambert, J. H. (2001) · Public Works Management & Policy · doi:10.1177/1087724x0153002 · Cited by 20
A Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization in Complex Course Timetabling
Son, N. T., Jafreezal, J., Nguyen, G., et al. (2021) · International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (ICSCA) · doi:10.1145/3457784.3457821 · Cited by 19
Ahmadvand, S., Khadivi, M., Arora, R., & Sowlati, T. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management X · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100101 · Cited by 23
Hasan, M. S. U., & Rai, A. K. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24708-9 · Cited by 19
Zhang, Y., Hua, Y., Kang, A., He, J., Jia, M., & Chiang, Y. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120442 · Cited by 20
A new optimization criterion for robust parameter design — the case of target is best
Ardakani, M. K., & Noorossana, R. (2007) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1141-6 · Cited by 19
Sustainability and intertemporal equity: a multicriteria approach
Colapinto, C., Liuzzi, D., & Marsiglio, S. (2015) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1837-1 · Cited by 19
Salado, A. (2015) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21332 · Cited by 19
Shenfield, A., & Rostami, S. (2017) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) · doi:10.1109/cibcb.2017.8058553 · Cited by 19
Ji, J.-H., & Chang, N. (2005) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-004-0219-z · Cited by 19
Preference-Based Decision Support in Software Engineering
Vetschera, R. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-29263-2_4 · Cited by 19
Experiments with an interactive paired comparison simplex method for molp problems
Malakooti, B. B., & Ravindran, A. (1986) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/bf02739240 · Cited by 19
Deterministic timed event graphs for performance optimization of cyclic manufacturing processes
Febbraro, A. D., Minciardi, R., & Sacone, S. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.563640 · Cited by 19
Nonlinear Integer Goal Programming Applied to Optimal System Reliability
Hwang, C. L., Lee, H. B., Tiliman, F. A., et al. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.1984.5221893 · Cited by 19
Self-citationGenetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design
Hajela, P., & LIN, C.-Y. (1991) · AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (SDM) · doi:10.2514/6.1991-1040 · Cited by 19
Hierarchical Rank Density Genetic Algorithm for Radial-Basis Function Neural Network Design
Yen, G. G., & Lu, H. (2003) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.1142/s1469026803000975 · Cited by 19
MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE ENGINEERING DESIGN
DLESK, D. C., & Liebman, J. S. (1983) · Engineering Optimization · doi:10.1080/03052158308902466 · Cited by 19
Chang, S. I., & Shivpuri, R. (1994) · Quality Engineering · doi:10.1080/08982119408918790 · Cited by 19
Problems in Scalarizing Multicriteria Approaches
Weidner, P. (2001) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_18 · Cited by 18
Stochastic Fuzzy Multi-level Multi-objective Fractional Programming Problem: A FGP Approach
Osman, M. S. A., Emam, O. E., & Sayed, M. A. E. (2017) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/s12597-017-0307-8 · Cited by 18
NAUTILUS Navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off
Ruiz, A. B., Ruiz, F., Miettinen, K., Delgado-Antequera, L., & Ojalehto, V. (2019) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-019-00765-2 · Cited by 18
Mirzaei, N., Mahmoodirad, A., & Niroomand, S. (2019) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-019-00734-7 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Sustainable Conceptual Designs Using an AHP-Based ELECTRE I Method
Nghiem, T. B. H., & Chu, T. (2021) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622021500280 · Cited by 18
Rajabzadeh, M., & Mousavi, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117071 · Cited by 20
Azadeh, A., Ahmadzadeh, K., & Eslami, H. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1482200 · Cited by 18
“This method minimizes the deviation of the objective functions from their feasible best solutions (Hwang and Masud 1979) as follows: minff ¼ X i w 0 i½ðfi f i Þ=f i ; (24) X i w 0 i ¼ 1: (25) The results of these two methods and the optimum value of each objective function are shown in Table 4.”
MethodAn EFQM‐Rembrandt excellence model based on the theory of displaced ideal
Tavana, M., Yazdi, A. K., Mehran, S., et al. (2011) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635771111166802 · Cited by 18
Asadzadeh, S., & Khoshalhan, F. (2008) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1709-9 · Cited by 18
Arbel, A., & Oren, S. S. (1986) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(86)90049-2 · Cited by 18
A multivariate solution of the multivariate ranking and selection problem
Dudewicz, E. J., & Taneja, V. S. (1981) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610928108828154 · Cited by 18
Harrison, T. P., & Rosenthal, R. E. (1988) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00261.x · Cited by 18
An interactive projection method for multicriteria optimization problems
Ferreira, P. A. V., & Geromel, J. C. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.57272 · Cited by 18
Physical programming's ability to generate a well-distributed set of Pareto points
Messac, A., & Sundararaj, G. J. (2000) · AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (SDM) · doi:10.2514/6.2000-1666 · Cited by 18
Weidner, P. (1994) · OR Spectrum · doi:10.1007/bf01720318 · Cited by 17
Klinke, N., Kobelev, V. V., & Schumacher, A. (2022) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-021-03111-x · Cited by 17
Cheng, L., Wu, W., Qiu, L., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108401 · Cited by 17
Azaron, A., & Kianfar, F. (2005) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.10.005 · Cited by 17
Steady‐state target calculation for constrained predictive control systems based on goal programming
Li, S., Zheng, Y., & Wang, B. (2008) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/apj.200 · Cited by 17
A Tradeoff-Based Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization Method Driven by Evolutionary Algorithms
Chen, L., Xin, B., & Chen, J. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0284 · Cited by 17
A Review of Secondhand Luxury and Vintage Clothing
Ryding, D., Wang, M., Fox, C., et al. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51253-2_12 · Cited by 17
An Interactive Goal Programming Procedure for Operational Recovery Problems
Golany, B., Xia, Y., Yang, J. J., et al. (2002) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1023/a:1020959218072 · Cited by 17
“This required the application of the method suggested by Hwang and Masud (1979) to handle nonliniarities in GP.”
MethodA robust interactive approach to optimize correlated multiple responses
Salmasnia, A., Bashiri, M., & Salehi, M. (2012) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4619-9 · Cited by 17
Land Use and Transportation Planning for Twin Cities Using a Genetic Algorithm
Balling, R. J., Taber, J. T., Day, K., et al. (2000) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1722-08 · Cited by 17
Miettinen, K., & Mäkelä, M. M. (1993) · Optimization methods & software · doi:10.1080/10556789308805533 · Cited by 17
Optimization of Automotive Systems
Bestle, D. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78119-3_25 · Cited by 17
Interactive Nonlinear Multiobjective Procedures
Miettinen, K. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48107-3_5 · Cited by 17
Experiments with an interactive paired comparison simplex method for molp problems
Malakooti, B. B., & Ravindran, A. (1985) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/bf02023612 · Cited by 17
THE CONCEPTIONS OF NEW PAYMENT METHODS BASED ON REVISED PAYMENT SERVICES DIRECTIVE (PSD2)
Możdżyński, D. (2017) · Information System in Management · doi:10.22630/isim.2017.6.1.5 · Cited by 16
Ghodratnama, A., Amiri-Aref, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. R. (2023) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2023.109349 · Cited by 16
Multi Objective Evaluator Model Development for Analyze the Customer Behavior
Krishnamoorthy, R., Kaliyamurthie, K. P., Ahamed, B. S., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Advancement in Electronics & Communication Engineering (AECE) · doi:10.1109/aece59614.2023.10428189 · Cited by 16
A Multi-Objective Decision Making Approach For Mutual Fund Portfolio
Sharma, H. P., & Sharma, D. K. (2011) · Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) · doi:10.19030/jber.v3i10.2821 · Cited by 16
Li, P., & Wu, D. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094760 · Cited by 16
Memetic EDA-Based Approaches to QoS-Aware Fully Automated Semantic Web Service Composition
Wang, C., Ma, H., Chen, G., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2021.3127633 · Cited by 16
A Complementarity Constraint Formulation of Convex Multiobjective Optimization Problems
Leyffer, S. (2008) · INFORMS journal on computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1080.0290 · Cited by 16
Dridi, I. H., Kammarti, R., Ksouri, M., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Computers Communications & Control · doi:10.15837/ijccc.2011.2.2172 · Cited by 16
“It is to transform the problem (MOP) in a problem (PMOλ) which combines the different cost functions of the problem into a single objective function F generally linear [26]:”
BackgroundInformation-driven Persistent Sensing of a Non-cooperative Mobile Target Using UAVs
Shin, H., García, A. J., & Álvarez, S. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-017-0719-y · Cited by 16
Interactive Multiobjective Optimization by the Sequential Proxy Optimization Technique (SPOT)
Sakawa, M. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.1982.5221434 · Cited by 16
Malakooti, B. B., & Subramanian, S. (1999) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/s0096-3003(98)10113-3 · Cited by 16
Some Algorithms to Solve a Bi-Objectives Problem for Team Selection
Son, N. T., Anh, B. N., Tran, T. T., et al. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082700 · Cited by 15
Designing empirical experiments to compare interactive multiobjective optimization methods
Afşar, B., Silvennoinen, J. M., Misitano, G., et al. (2022) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2022.2141145 · Cited by 15
“Multiobjective optimization methods can be classified according to the DM ’ s role in the solution process as no-preference, a priori, a posteriori and interactive methods (Hwang & Masud, 1979; Miettinen, 1999).”
MethodShaw, K., Lahri, V., Shankar, R., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2022.3230752 · Cited by 15
Multicriteria Reconfiguration of Distribution Network with Distributed Generation
Voropai, N., & Bat-Undraal, B. (2012) · Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1155/2012/317315 · Cited by 15
Structuring innovation funnels for R & D projects under uncertainty
Wang, J. (2015) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12183 · Cited by 15
Locating rental stations and bikeways in a public bike system
Lin, J., Lin, C.-T., & Feng, C. (2018) · Transportation Planning and Technology · doi:10.1080/03081060.2018.1453915 · Cited by 15
Multi-Objective Service Selection and Scheduling with Linguistic Preference in Cloud Manufacturing
He, W. L., Jia, G., Zong, H., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092619 · Cited by 15
Sotiriou, C., & Zachariadis, T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128623 · Cited by 15
Fattoruso, G. (2022) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm15100431 · Cited by 15
Akhbari, M., & Grigg, N. S. (2014) · Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000737 · Cited by 15
Computational steering of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for engineering design
Shenfield, A., Fleming, P. J., & Alkarouri, M. (2007) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2007.01.005 · Cited by 15
Optimization of multi-product batch plant design under uncertainty with environmental considerations
Wang, Z., Jia, X., & Shi, L. (2009) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-009-0207-6 · Cited by 15
Optimization of exit location in underground spaces
Kallianiotis, A., & Kaliampakos, D. (2016) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2016.08.004 · Cited by 15
Reducing Building Conflicts in Map Generalization with an Improved PSO Algorithm
Huang, H., Qingsheng, G., Sun, Y., et al. (2017) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi6050127 · Cited by 15
TAX ADMINISTRATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Lipniewicz, R. (2017) · Information System in Management · doi:10.22630/isim.2017.6.1.3 · Cited by 15
Sotoudeh-Anvari, A., Sadjadi, S. J., Molana, S. M. H., et al. (2018) · Scientia Iranica · doi:10.24200/sci.2018.20226 · Cited by 15
Pankajakshan, A., Waldron, C. J., Quaglio, M., et al. (2019) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2019.10.003 · Cited by 15
Solving multiple-objective problems in the objective space
Ferreira, P. A. V., & Machado, M. E. S. (1996) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf02275354 · Cited by 15
Galperin, E. A., & Guerra, P. J. (2001) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1023/a:1026465906067 · Cited by 15
Multi-Objective Approach for Designing Transit Routes with Frequencies
Israeli, Y., & Ceder, A. A. (1996) · Transportation analysis · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85256-5_8 · Cited by 15
Multiobjective Programming: Basic Concepts and Approaches
Vanderpooten, D. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2111-5_2 · Cited by 15
Use of the displaced worst compromise in interactive multiobjective programming
Michalowski, W. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.7497 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M.
- Affiliations
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1979
- ISSN
- 0075-8442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233757421
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- multi-objective decision making, computational methods, multi-objective optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review