Cited by 1,139Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsDigital Education and SocietyEducation and Technology Integration

Toward a Design Science of Education

Collins, Allan·1992·New Directions in Educational Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, A.
Corresponding author
Collins, Allan
Venue
New Directions in Educational Technology
Published
1992
Pages
15-22
OpenAlex
W1670942626
Cited by
1,139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 51
FWCI
3.27
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
design science, educational sciences, design experiments, educational technology, design theory, educational innovation, learning environment, experimental method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review