Cited by 492Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Remarks on the Mind-Body Question

Wigner, E. P.·1995·Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-78374-6_20

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 492

Metadata

Authors
Wigner, E. P.
Corresponding author
Wigner, E. P.
Venue
Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses
Published
1995
Pages
247-260
OpenAlex
W1485523613
Cited by
486
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
55.19
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
mind-body problem, consciousness, philosophy of mind, scientific inquiry, physicalism, nature of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review