The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remarks on the Mind-Body Question
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It turns out that thought experiments can be designed whereby textbook quantum mechanics violates the assumption of LF.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“LF inequalities bound what observed outcome statistics are possible for Alice and Bob when LF holds [3].”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“In [3], the authors performed an experiment with a specific instance of the EWFS and derived specific LF inequalities that were experimentally violated.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Local Friendliness comes from the conjunction of two basic assumptions about reality [3,5].”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Quantum mechanics indicates that it should, in principle, be possible to violate these LF inequalities.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Semi-Brukner 0.380364 0.82843”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“This operator balances the contributions of the soul and physical realm in the decision-making process (Wigner, 1995).”
From The collapse of the wave function as the mediator of free will in prime neurons (2025) · cites this paper as Wigner, 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002 · Cited by 983
“Moreover, the proposed connection between consciousness and quantum measurement is almost opposite, in the Orch OR scheme, to the kind of idea that had frequently been put forward in the early days of quantum mechanics (see, for example Wigner [105]) which suggests that a ‘quantum measurement’ is something that occurs…”
BackgroundQUANTUM EQUILIBRIUM AND THE ORIGIN OF ABSOLUTE UNCERTAINTY
D�rr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zangh�, N. (2015) · Cited by 555
Consciousness and its Place in Nature
Chalmers, D. J. (2003) · The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind · doi:10.1002/9780470998762.ch5 · Cited by 574
“26 Consciousness-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics have been put forward by Wigner (1961) ,”
BackgroundCoecke, B., & Kissinger, A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316219317 · Cited by 512
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical — Revisited
Zurek, W. H. (2006) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7808-0_1 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Wigner, E. P.
- Corresponding author
- Wigner, E. P.
- Venue
- Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 247-260
- OpenAlex
- W1485523613
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 55.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- mind-body problem, consciousness, philosophy of mind, scientific inquiry, physicalism, nature of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
