The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remarks on the Mind-Body Question
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It turns out that thought experiments can be designed whereby textbook quantum mechanics violates the assumption of LF.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“LF inequalities bound what observed outcome statistics are possible for Alice and Bob when LF holds [3].”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“In [3], the authors performed an experiment with a specific instance of the EWFS and derived specific LF inequalities that were experimentally violated.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Local Friendliness comes from the conjunction of two basic assumptions about reality [3,5].”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Quantum mechanics indicates that it should, in principle, be possible to violate these LF inequalities.”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Semi-Brukner 0.380364 0.82843”
From Towards violations of Local Friendliness with quantum computers (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“This operator balances the contributions of the soul and physical realm in the decision-making process (Wigner, 1995).”
From The collapse of the wave function as the mediator of free will in prime neurons (2025) · cites this paper as Wigner, 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002 · Cited by 983
“Moreover, the proposed connection between consciousness and quantum measurement is almost opposite, in the Orch OR scheme, to the kind of idea that had frequently been put forward in the early days of quantum mechanics (see, for example Wigner [105]) which suggests that a ‘quantum measurement’ is something that occurs…”
BackgroundQUANTUM EQUILIBRIUM AND THE ORIGIN OF ABSOLUTE UNCERTAINTY
D�rr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zangh�, N. (2015) · Cited by 555
Consciousness and its Place in Nature
Chalmers, D. J. (2003) · The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind · doi:10.1002/9780470998762.ch5 · Cited by 574
“26 Consciousness-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics have been put forward by Wigner (1961) ,”
BackgroundCoecke, B., & Kissinger, A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316219317 · Cited by 512
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical — Revisited
Zurek, W. H. (2006) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7808-0_1 · Cited by 572
On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics
Fay Dowker, B., & Kent, A. (1996) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02183396 · Cited by 379
QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
Fuchs, C. A. (2010) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1003.5209 · Cited by 295
“Indeed, a home localized in space and time - namely, the physical site of the agent who assigns it! By this method, one expels once and for all the fear that quantum mechanics leads to ”spooky action at a distance,” and expels as well any hint of a problem with ”Wigners friend” [17].”
BackgroundQuantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames
Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E., & Brukner, Č. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0 · Cited by 365
A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox
Bong, K.-W., Utreras-Alarcón, A., Ghafari, F., Liang, Y.-C., Tischler, N., Cavalcanti, E. G., Pryde, G. J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x · Cited by 224
“[1] Wigner, E.”
Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes, and theorems
Laloë, F. (2001) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1356698 · Cited by 203
Ideal Negative Measurements in Quantum Walks Disprove Theories Based on Classical Trajectories
Robens, C., Alt, W., Meschede, D., Emary, C., & Alberti, A. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.011003 · Cited by 172
“[6] E.”
BackgroundDo We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?
Laloë, F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569361 · Cited by 171
On the Quantum Measurement Problem
Brukner, Č. (2017) · The Frontiers Collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38987-5_5 · Cited by 152
Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Timpson, C. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296460.001.0001 · Cited by 152
“nario, for example, (Wigner, 1961) rather than there having to be a mysterious collapse at some point, both agents involved simply ascribe different states to the system being measured.”
BackgroundConsciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-Time Geometry and Orch OR Theory
Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. R. (2011) · Cited by 139
A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework
Vanrietvelde, A., Höhn, P. A., Giacomini, F., & Castro-Ruiz, E. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225 · Cited by 217
“, see [61,83–86]).”
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation
Camilleri, K. (2009) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc.2009.17.1.26 · Cited by 111
Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics
Timpson, C. G., & Brown, H. R. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-2726 · Cited by 107
Timpson, C. G. (2008) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.03.006 · Cited by 107
“) A familiar way of making the measurement problem vivid is by appeal to a Wigner’s friend scenario (Wigner, 1961).”
BackgroundRespecting One’s Fellow: QBism’s Analysis of Wigner’s Friend
DeBrota, J. B., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2020) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-020-00369-x · Cited by 107
“Wigner’s famous thought experiment [3] is a tale of two agents.”
BackgroundHow quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will
Hameroff, S. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00093 · Cited by 95
“Wigner (1961) and von Neumann (1932/1955) further stipulated that the superposition continues in the device until the results are observed by a conscious human, that conscious observation “collapses the wave function.””
BackgroundSwitching Internal Times and a New Perspective on the ‘Wave Function of the Universe’
Höhn, P. A. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5050116 · Cited by 117
“That is, one has to revisit the measurement problem (and specifically the Wigner friend paradox [73, 79, 87–89]), but now with a complete relational quantum theory at hand, as proposed here, which contains both a perspective-neutral description and all the individual perspectives, a structure that was not available be…”
BackgroundStable Facts, Relative FactsPreprint
Biagio, A. D., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2020) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 98
Quantum Information as a General Paradigm
Auletta, G. (2005) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-005-4565-6 · Cited by 89
“Many physicists have interpreted the quantum–mechanical state in this way, for instance Wigner ( 6 ,7) and, recently, van Fraassen.”
BackgroundThe origin of the Everettian heresy
Osnaghi, S., Freitas, F., & Freire, O. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.10.002 · Cited by 88
Randomness Is Unpredictability
Eagle, A. (2005) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axi138 · Cited by 86
“The occurrence and amount of rainfall are random inputs.4 The details are interesting, but for our purposes the point to remember is that the randomness of the rainfall input is important in explaining the robust structure of the dynamics of soil moisture.”
BackgroundEntanglement: quantum or classical?
Paneru, D., Cohen, E., Fickler, R., Boyd, R. W., & Karimi, E. (2020) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab85b9 · Cited by 86
“Wigner [67] proposed an extension of this experiment, with two observers.”
MethodRelational Quantum Mechanics is About Facts, Not States: A Reply to Pienaar and Brukner
Biagio, A. D., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2022) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-022-00579-5 · Cited by 91
“The notation is meant to suggest the setup of Wigner’s friend thought experiment [7].”
BackgroundA third transition in science?
Kauffman, S. A., & Roli, A. (2023) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2022.0063 · Cited by 88
Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups
de la Hamette, A.-C., & Galley, T. D. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-11-30-367 · Cited by 118
A no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner’s friend’s perception
Guérin, P. A., Baumann, V., Santo, F. D., & Brukner, Č. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00589-1 · Cited by 82
Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function
Chalmers, D. J., & McQueen, K. J. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197501665.003.0002 · Cited by 131
The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity
Akers, C., Engelhardt, N., Harlow, D., Penington, G., & Vardhan, S. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)155 · Cited by 75
The N-space Episenome unifies cellular information space-time within cognition-based evolution
Miller, W. B., Torday, J. S., & Baluška, F. (2019) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.08.006 · Cited by 70
A detector-based measurement theory for quantum field theory
Polo-Gómez, J., Garay, L. J., & Martín-Martínez, E. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.065003 · Cited by 66
“, the quantum Zeno effect [34, 35], the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment [36–40], or the Wigner’s friend experiment [41, 42], among others) in which the ability to perform measurements and using the information of the outcomes to update the state is essential for their implementation.”
BackgroundIndeterminism in physics and intuitionistic mathematics
Gisin, N. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03378-z · Cited by 69
NON-RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS
Dickson, M. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451560-5/50007-5 · Cited by 67
“One approach to drawing the distinction (between cases where collapse occurs and cases where no collapse occurs) that arguably avoids both of these pitfalls, and arguably does begin to smell like interpretation of the theory, is due to Wigner (1961).”
BackgroundHow Do Living Systems Create Meaning?
Fields, C., & Levin, M. G. (2020) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies5040036 · Cited by 59
French, S. (2002) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(02)00019-9 · Cited by 62
Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups
de la Hamette, A.-C., & Galley, T. D. (2020) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000458288 · Cited by 60
Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem
Brukner, Č. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03513 · Cited by 57
“The explicit quantum description of an observer is at the heart of the Wigner’s friend thought experiment [2].”
BackgroundWhy interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory
Catani, L., Leifer, M., Schmid, D., & Spekkens, R. W. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-09-25-1119 · Cited by 76
“(The only prominent exceptions are certain proposals for dynamical collapse models where the consciousness of the observer is implicated in the mechanism that leads to collapse [96, 97].”
BackgroundConcept of consciousness in the context of quantum mechanics
Менский, М. Б. (2005) · Physics-Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu2005v048n04abeh002075 · Cited by 56
“Wigner [7] considered a situation in which not he himself but his friend performs measurements of some quantum system to let him know the measurement result afterwards.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Crazyist Metaphysics of Mind
Schwitzgebel, E. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2014.910675 · Cited by 55
“…the bizarreness of quantum mechanics and the lack of consensus about its interpretation, including the fact that some interpretations treat mentality as fundamental (such as the many minds view and some versions of the Copenhagen interpretation [Wigner 1961; Albert and Loewer 1988; Faye 2008]).”
BackgroundScience as if situation mattered
Bitbol, M. (2002) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1020328422900 · Cited by 51
“Darwin (1929) to E. Wigner (1979) , relied on a dualist view of the mind-body problem to provide the measurement problem with a dubious “solution”: the collapse of the wave-function by an act of conscious awareness.”
BackgroundNontrivial quantum and quantum-like effects in biosystems: Unsolved questions and paradoxes
Melkikh, A. V., & Khrennikov, A. Y. (2015) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.07.001 · Cited by 49
Intelligent Computing Everywhere
Schuster, A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-943-9_1 · Cited by 46
Quantum theory and consciousness: an overview with selectedexamples
Harald Atmanspacher, A. (2004) · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society · doi:10.1155/s102602260440106x · Cited by 45
“In the 1960s, Wigner followed up on this proposal in [86] (in his later writings, he repudiated this point of view about the role of consciousness, stating that “it is outside the realm of quantum mechanics” [87]), coining the example of his now proverbial “Wigner’s friend.”
BackgroundOn the Physical Reality of Quantum Waves
Auletta, G., & Tarozzi, G. (2004) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1309-y · Cited by 43
“(7) Wigner pointed out that only detection events are real (what you get is what you measure) and that the wave function is only a mathematical tool in order to calculate probabilities between a detection event and another.”
BackgroundInfluentialGeneralized probability rules from a timeless formulation of Wigner's friend scenarios
Baumann, V., Santo, F. D., Smith, A. R. H., Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E., & Brukner, Č. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-08-16-524 · Cited by 45
“This situation is illustrated by the gedankenexperiment of Wigner’s friend [4].”
BackgroundConsciousness and its place in nature
(2001) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/s1389-0417(01)00028-6 · Cited by 41
The original Wigner’s friend paradox within a realist toy model
Lostaglio, M., & Bowles, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0273 · Cited by 42
“The original Wigner’s friend gedankenexperiment is a thought experiment first considered byWigner in 1961 [1] that highlights the tension between unitary evolution and measurement collapse in quantum theory.”
BackgroundSaunders, S. W. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560561.003.0001 · Cited by 39
How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory
Grinbaum, A. (2017) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.03.003 · Cited by 45
“The “Wigner’s friend” gedankenexperiment [80] assumes that different observers will agree on system identification but disagree on state ascriptions.”
BackgroundQuantum mechanics and consciousness
Beck, F., & Darmstadt, T. H. (2018) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789813273702_0018 · Cited by 37
Physics and Metaphysics of Wigner’s Friends: Even Performed Premeasurements Have No Results
Żukowski, M., & Markiewicz, M. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.130402 · Cited by 43
“’ whenever thinking about the Author of [32]).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Historical Roots of ‘‘Foundations of Quantum Physics’’ as a Field of Research (1950–1970)
Freire, O. (2004) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1314-1 · Cited by 37
“In the early 1960s, Wigner published two papers that would become the centerpiece of his views on the foundations of quantum mechanics.(31,32) He revisited a distinction first emphasized by von Neumann between two kinds of evolution of quantum states.”
BackgroundRenes, J. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.02193 · Cited by 39
“The distinction is exemplified in the Wigner’s friend thought experiment [2, 3].”
BackgroundReference Frame Induced Symmetry Breaking on Holographic Screens
Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., & Marcianò, A. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13030408 · Cited by 29
Physical versus computational complementarity. I
Calude, C. S., Calude, E., Svozil, K., & Yü, S. (1997) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02435752 · Cited by 32
“The notion of measurement, in turn, is a highly nontrivial matter, as contemplations by Wigner [77], Wheeler [75], and Bell [3], among many others, show.”
BackgroundA consciousness-based quantum objective collapse model
Okon, E., & Sebastián, M. Á. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1887-4 · Cited by 33
Towards a Coherent Theory of Physics and Mathematics
Benioff, P. A. (2002) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1016561108807 · Cited by 38
“( 66 , 67) These avenues will not be pursued here as they do not seem to be the best way to progress towards developing a coherent theory of mathematics and physics.”
BackgroundIf Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer?
Fields, C. (2012) · Cited by 30
QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero's HandbookPreprint
Fuchs, C. A., & Stacey, B. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.07308 · Cited by 61
“expels once and for all the fear that quantum mechanics leads to “spooky action at a distance,” and expels as well any hint of a problem with “Wigner’s friend” [34].”
BackgroundWhat Does ‘(Non)-absoluteness of Observed Events’ Mean?
Adlam, E. (2024) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-023-00747-1 · Cited by 34
“The non-absoluteness theorems are descendants of the Wigner’s friend paradox[6], which describes a scenario in which some observer, Chidi, performs a measurement {|Si〉〈Si|} on a system S, and then another observer, Alice, performs a measurement on the joint system of Chidi and S.”
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2021) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104471 · Cited by 28
“The majority of the quantum community did not share Wigner’s viewpoint; for them physical measurement is terminated at the pointer of an apparatus. is operating with superpositions of alternatives.”
BackgroundDo neural correlates of consciousness cause conscious states?
Fell, J., Elger, C. E., & Kurthen, M. (2004) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2003.12.048 · Cited by 27
“But, in spite of the long tradition of this argument [18], there is as yet no direct scientific evidence for such a causal interaction between conscious mind and quantum-physical objects.”
BackgroundProperties and Dispositions: Some Metaphysical Remarks on Quantum Ontology
Dorato, M. (2006) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.2219359 · Cited by 27
“And this sense has also been regarded as important in all those interpretations in which human consciousness is explicitly invoked to solve the measurement problem [4,5].”
Background(2015) · AccessScience · doi:10.1036/1097-8542.580000 · Cited by 27
Wiseman, H. M., Cavalcanti, E. G., & Rieffel, E. G. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-09-14-1112 · Cited by 38
“to speculate as to whether a given intelligence has the “same types of impressions and sensations” [2] as our own.”
BackgroundInformation, immaterialism, instrumentalism: Old and new in quantum information
Timpson, C. G. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511676550.012 · Cited by 23
“Consider one of the common formulations of the measurement problem: Wigner’s friend (Wigner, 1961).”
BackgroundScientific Objectivity and Its Limits
Healey, R. (2021) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/716169 · Cited by 25
“2.1 The scenario of Wigner=s Friend Wigner (1961) considered a hypothetical scenario in which his friend (whom I will call Alice) is confined to a physically isolated laboratory while performing a quantum measurement on a system (I=ll take this to be of the z-spin of a spin 2 atom initially…”
BackgroundInfluentialCongenital programs of the behavior and nontrivial quantum effects in the neurons work
Melkikh, A. V. (2014) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.03.005 · Cited by 23
“Wigner (1961) was one of the first who suggested that quantum ffects (in particular – the collapse of the wave function) were assoiated with consciousness.”
BackgroundIntegrated Information-Induced Quantum Collapse
Kremnizer, K., & Ranchin, A. (2015) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9905-6 · Cited by 25
“ing fundamental issues in quantum theory is not new [34,39].”
BackgroundA critical evaluation of the theory and practice of therapeutic touch
O’Mathúna, D. P., Pryjmachuk, S., Spencer, W., Stanwick, M., & Matthiesen, S. (2002) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1046/j.1466-769x.2002.00089.x · Cited by 25
Holland, P. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622687.013 · Cited by 25
Any consistent coupling between classical gravity and quantum matter is fundamentally irreversible
Galley, T. D., Giacomini, F., & Selby, J. H. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-16-1142 · Cited by 25
“…structure [49–51] (in which the pieces of apparatus locally have a well defined causal structure but in which no global causal structure exists between them) or extended Wigner’s friend scenarios [52–57] (in which the experimenters themselves are treated as part of the experimental scenario).”
BackgroundDoes consciousness really collapse the wave function?
Thaheld, F. H. (2005) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2005.03.001 · Cited by 24
Information, Perception, and Action: A Reply to Commentators
Michaels, C. F., Withagen, R., Jacobs, D. M., Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Bongers, R. M. (2001) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1303_3 · Cited by 24
“Our game is based on Wigner’s (1962) proof that another person is conscious by virtue of effects of their observa-”
MethodQuantum algorithmic information theoryPreprint
Svozil, K. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9510005 · Cited by 24
“” Where does this irreversible observation take place? Since the physical laws (with the possible exception of the weak force) are time-reversible, the act of irreversible observation must, according to Wigner [96], occur in the consciousness, thereby violating quantum mechanics.”
BackgroundQuantum dissidents: Research on the foundations of quantum theory circa 1970
Freire, O. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 23
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Adlam, E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108885515 · Cited by 24
Origin of life and the underlying physics of the universe
Conrad, M. (1997) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/s0303-2647(97)01705-x · Cited by 22
The hidden assumptions of Frauchiger and RennerPreprint
Sudbery, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13248 · Cited by 30
“The argument proceeds by applying these assumptions in analysing a Gedankenexperiment obtained by extending the “Wigner’s friend” experiment described by Wigner in [16].”
MethodWong, H. Y. (2006) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/515413 · Cited by 21
“…may be proven wrong in the endgame, but the causal completeness of physics is not completely obvious given the state of today’s science (consider, e.g., consciousnesscollapse interpretations of quantum mechanics by Wigner 1961 and Stapp 1993)—though the burden is on the emergentist to show this.”
BackgroundA possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox
Haddara, M., & Cavalcanti, E. G. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aceea3 · Cited by 20
Some people and some problems met in half a century of commitment to mathematical physics
Haag, R. (2010) · The European Physical Journal H · doi:10.1140/epjh/e2010-10032-4 · Cited by 21
Svozil, K. (2018) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70815-7 · Cited by 33
Cell phenomenology: The first phenomenon
Pattee, H. H. (2015) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.06.010 · Cited by 19
Decoherence framework for Wigner's-friend experiments
Relaño, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032107 · Cited by 19
“The decoherence formalism establishes that this environment, not present in standard Wigner’s friend setups [1–4], determines to which states the memory of Wigner’s friend collapses, and therefore which outcomes are recorded by her.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialQuantum mechanics and the psyche
Carminati, G. G., & Martin, F. (2008) · Physics of Particles and Nuclei · doi:10.1134/s1063779608040047 · Cited by 21
“Works on the role of consciousness in the quantum measurement process go back to von Neumann [1] and to Wigner [5].”
BackgroundInfluentialMODELLING AND GENERATING COMPLEX EMERGENT BEHAVIOUR
Kitto, K. (2006) · Cited by 20
The Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Irwin, K., Amaral, M. M., & Chester, D. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22020247 · Cited by 21
“Derivative off-shoots, such as Wigner and Stapp’s consciousness causes collapse interpretation [35,36] and Qbism [37,38], also postulate that consciousness is the fundamental quantum operator or actualizer of reality.”
BackgroundInfluentialTesting quantum theory with thought experiments
Nurgalieva, N., & Renner, R. (2020) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2021.1880075 · Cited by 26
“This aspect occurs again in the famous Wigner’s friend experiment, proposed by Eugene Wigner in 1961 to shed light on the quantum measurement process [21].”
BackgroundInfluentialSun, K., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Hao, Z.-Y., Xu, X.-Y., Xu, J., Li, C., Guo, G., Castellini, A., Lami, L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2119765119 · Cited by 22
van der Meyden, R., & Patra, M. K. (2003) · doi:10.1145/846241.846257 · Cited by 18
“There have been attempts in the literature on quantum foundations to explain the apparent stability of the classical world from the perspective of quantum mechanics, and there is an example known as “Wigner’s friend” that deals with epistemic concerns in such attempts [Wig62].”
BackgroundThe World According to Quantum Mechanics (Or the 18 Errors of Henry P. Stapp)
Mohrhoff, U. (2002) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1014409209728 · Cited by 18
“According to some theorists [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], consciousness is needed for making sense of quantum mechanics (QM).”
BackgroundWigner’s friend and Relational Quantum Mechanics: A Reply to Laudisa
Weststeijn, N. (2021) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00487-0 · Cited by 17
“The real Wigner [15] also argues, however, that if we would replace the friend with an inanimate measuring instrument, we would not prioritize the point of view of the instrument.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRepresentations of epistemic uncertainty and awareness in data-driven strategies
Angelelli, M., Gervasi, M., & Ciavolino, E. (2024) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-024-09661-8 · Cited by 19
“…analogies with other scenarios characterized by ambiguity, such as Ellsberg’s urn models (Ellsberg 1961), and explore inequivalent descriptions arising from different data observation levels in measurement settings, such as in Wigner’s Friend experiment (Wigner 1995; Frauchiger and Renner 2018).”
Making Sense of a World of Clicks
Mohrhoff, U. (2002) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1019775404748 · Cited by 17
“Since the beginning of time (in about 1926) it has been argued that QM is about experience, knowledge, or information [16, 17, 18, 19], rather than about a free-standing reality capable of being described without reference to observers, their information, their interventions into “the course of Nature” [20], or their…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wigner, E. P.
- Corresponding author
- Wigner, E. P.
- Venue
- Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1995
- Pages
- 247-260
- OpenAlex
- W1485523613
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 55.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Keywords
- mind-body problem, consciousness, philosophy of mind, scientific inquiry, physicalism, nature of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review