The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-Level Context”?
Abstract
The aim of this project is to examine new forms of governance for promoting sustainability and innovation and to place this discussion in the context of a multi-level polity (i.e. the European Union). Its principal hypothesis is that the participation of individuals and organizations in governance arrangements can not only improve both sustainability and innovation, but also make them compatible with each other. And, its second — more implicit — hypothesis is that these arrangements are not only compatible with liberal democracy, but also can contribute to legitimizing the European Union. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Cited by
Responsibility and Environmental Governance
Pellizzoni, L. (2004) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/0964401042000229034 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitter, P. C.
- Venue
- Participatory Governance
- Publisher
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 51-69
- OpenAlex
- W2160110233
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 93.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-Level Context”? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-663-11003-3_3
- The paper
- Schmitter, P. C. (2002). Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-Level Context”? Participatory Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11003-3_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
