The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsibility and Environmental Governance
Abstract
In the debate on governance the concept of responsibility is frequently invoked but remains underdeveloped. This article aims at showing its analytical relevance as a means of interpreting ongoing changes in policy approaches and for evaluating their ability to cope with environmental challenges. Four dimensions of responsibility are singled out: care, liability, accountability and responsiveness. The caring state has been overtaken, to a remarkable extent, by new arrangements centred on the expansion of liability and above all accountability, while responsiveness remains a rather neglected aspect. Such neglect represents a major reason for the debatable results of governance as regards environmental protection and the recovery of institutional and corporate legitimacy and social trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
The New Governance: Governing without Government
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x · Cited by 4,317
Science for the post-normal age
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l · Cited by 4,255
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,652
The Audit Society: Rituals of VerificationPreprint
Power, M. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3,596
Lehman, E. W., & Sztompka, P. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089802 · Cited by 2,218
Michalos, A. C., & Poff, D. C. (2018) · Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_260-2 · Cited by 1,946
Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-0267 · Cited by 1,736
Giddens, A. (1999) · The Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00188 · Cited by 1,568
Cited by
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities
Boström, M., Jönsson, A. M., Lockie, S., Mol, A. P. J., & Oosterveer, P. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.050 · Cited by 319
Janssens, L., Kuppens, T., Andersson, P., & Struyven, K. (2024) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100988 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pellizzoni, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 541-565
- ISSN
- 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2051644409
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsibility and Environmental Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0964401042000229034
- The paper
- Pellizzoni, L. (2004). Responsibility and Environmental Governance. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
