Cited by 325Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of Science

Graphical Causal Models

Elwert, Felix·2013·Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_13

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DAGs generalize conventional linear path diagrams and are entirely nonparametric.

    “a generalization of conventional linear path diagrams (Wright 1934, Blalock 1964, Duncan 1966, Bollen 1989) that is entirely nonparametric”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elwert, F.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Elwert, Felix
Venue
Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
Published
2013
Pages
245-273
ISSN
1389-6903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2179859124
Cited by
325
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
34.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbooks of sociology and social research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
directed acyclic graphs, causal inference, observational data, causal identification, d-separation, confounding, overcontrol, social networks, time-varying treatments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review