Cited by 8Higher Education Governance and DevelopmentPolitical Science Research and EducationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The Design and Methods of the Comparative Study

Teichler, Ulrich, Arimoto, Akira, Cummings, William K.·2013·The Changing Academic Profession

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-6155-1_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wilhelm von Humboldt launched a new kind of university that inextricably linked teaching and research and viewed both as inseparable core responsibilities of professors.

    “In Germany, Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767-1835) launched a new kind of university (Paletschek 2002) that inextricably linked teaching and research (B4) and viewed both as inseparable core responsibilities of professors (Teichler et al. 2013).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Kurashiki Sakuyo University (JP)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
The Changing Academic Profession
Published
2013
Pages
25-35
OpenAlex
W66325217
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
academic profession, international research collaboration, questionnaire development, conceptual framework, target population selection, research funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review