The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences of Opinion in Financial Markets
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
Stiglitz, J. E., & Grossman, S. J. (1980) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8765r99 · Cited by 3,645
Cited by
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301556400 · Cited by 5,276
Forecasting crashes: trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices
Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00066-6 · Cited by 1,907
Differences of Opinion Make a Horse Race
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1993) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.3.473 · Cited by 1,643
Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?
Kirman, A. P. (1992) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.6.2.117 · Cited by 1,595
Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (1998) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.139415 · Cited by 1,083
Metadata
- Authors
- Varian, H. R.
- Venue
- Financial Risk: Theory, Evidence and Implications
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1989
- Pages
- 3-37
- OpenAlex
- W2060760734
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences of Opinion in Financial Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-009-2665-3_1
- The paper
- Varian, H. R. (1989). Differences of Opinion in Financial Markets. Financial Risk: Theory, Evidence and Implications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2665-3_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
