Cited by 567Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsClimate Change Policy and Economics

G EOENGINEERING THE C LIMATE: History and Prospect

Keith, David W.·2000·Annual Review of Energy and the Environment

Abstract

▪ Abstract Geoengineering is the intentional large-scale manipulation of the environment, particularly manipulation that is intended to reduce undesired anthropogenic climate change. The post-war rise of climate and weather modification and the history of U.S. assessments of the CO 2-climate problem is reviewed. Proposals to engineer the climate are shown to be an integral element of this history. Climate engineering is reviewed with an emphasis on recent developments, including low-mass space-based scattering systems for altering the planetary albedo, simulation of the climate's response to albedo modification, and new findings on iron fertilization in oceanic ecosystems. There is a continuum of human responses to the climate problem that vary in resemblance to hard geoengineering schemes such as space-based mirrors. The distinction between geoengineering and mitigation is therefore fuzzy. A definition is advanced that clarifies the distinction between geoengineering and industrial carbon management. Assessment of geoengineering is reviewed under various framings including economics, risk, politics, and environmental ethics. Finally, arguments are presented for the importance of explicit debate about the implications of countervailing measures such as geoengineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.245

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solar geoengineering proposals are real proposals for solar radiation management.

    “Airships floating through the sky, spraying aerosols; robotic boats crisscrossing the ocean, firing vertical jets of spray; arrays of mirrors carefully positioned in space, micro-adjusted by remote control; these images seem like science fiction, but they are actually real proposals for solar radiation management, commonly called solar geoengineering [375,418,419,728].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [419]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keith, D. W.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Keith, David W.
Venue
Annual Review of Energy and the Environment
Published
2000-11
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
245-284
ISSN
1056-3466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048911136
Cited by
567
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 33
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Energy and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
geoengineering, solar radiation management, planetary albedo, iron fertilization, ocean carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation, history of climate science, environmental ethics, risk assessment, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review