The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Models
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Dewey' s idea of concepts as tools or plans of actions resembles Ludwig Wittgenstein' s metaphor of words as tools, as well as Marx Wartofsky' s theory of secondary artefacts.”
From The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action (2000) · cites this paper as Wartofsky 1979
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
Roth, W., & Lee, Y. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654306298273 · Cited by 1,240
Sawyer, R. K. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511734892 · Cited by 750
The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action
Miettinen, R. (2000) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/026013700293458 · Cited by 658
Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration
Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. A. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0664 · Cited by 650
Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape
Wiggins, B. E., & Bowers, G. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814535194 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Wartofsky, M. W.
- Corresponding author
- Wartofsky, Marx W.
- Venue
- Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1979
- ISSN
- 0068-0346 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4250826671
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Boston studies in the philosophy of science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- philosophy of science, models, philosophy of biology, philosophy of physics, philosophy of mathematics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
