The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 7,947
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,395
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
Schiffrin, D. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611841 · Cited by 2,810
Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804489 · Cited by 1,499
English Text: System and structure
Martin, J. R. (1992) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.59 · Cited by 1,451
Popowich, F. (1999) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering · doi:10.1002/047134608x.w6910 · Cited by 834
Grimes, J. E. (1975) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110886474 · Cited by 792
Cited by
An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations
Marcu, D., & Echihabi, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073145 · Cited by 382
Self-citationRevisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613742 · Cited by 375
Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays
Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1006 · Cited by 363
From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey
Peldszus, A., & Stede, M. (2013) · International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence · doi:10.4018/jcini.2013010101 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E.
- Venue
- Text, Speech and Language Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 85-112
- ISSN
- 1386-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4250641076
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-010-0019-2_5
- The paper
- Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E. (2003). Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Text, Speech and Language Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0019-2_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
