The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations
Open accessAbstract
We present an unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations of CONTRAST, EXPLANATION-EVIDENCE, CONDITION and ELABORATION that hold between arbitrary spans of texts. We show that discourse relation classifiers trained on examples that are automatically extracted from massive amounts of text can be used to distinguish between some of these relations with accuracies as high as 93%, even when the relations are not explicitly marked by cue phrases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database
Kilgarriff, A., & Fellbaum, C. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,464
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315836010 · Cited by 6,082
Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization
MANN, W. C., & THOMPSON, S. A. (1988) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243 · Cited by 3,853
(1999) · Cited by 1,521
English Text: System and structure
Martin, J. R. (1992) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.59 · Cited by 1,451
Scaling to very very large corpora for natural language disambiguation
Banko, M., & Brill, E. (2001) · Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073012.1073017 · Cited by 675
Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment
Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (1993) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/bf00986208 · Cited by 639
The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization
Marcu, D. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6754.001.0001 · Cited by 620
Self-citationBuilding a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory
Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E. (2001) · Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue - · doi:10.3115/1118078.1118083 · Cited by 584
Self-citation
Cited by
Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays
Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1006 · Cited by 363
Sentence retrieval for abstracts of randomized controlled trials.
Chung, G. Y. (2009) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-10 · Cited by 83
Lacson, R. C., Barzilay, R., & Long, W. J. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.009 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcu, D., & Echihabi, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 368
- OpenAlex
- W2152197045
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1073083.1073145
- The paper
- Marcu, D., & Echihabi, A. (2001). An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02. https://doi.org/10.3115/1073083.1073145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.