The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Cited by
Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995) · User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/bf01099821 · Cited by 2,324
An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02319856 · Cited by 1,576
The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments
Messick, S. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023002013 · Cited by 1,315
Assessments and Accountability
Linn, R. L. (2000) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1177052 · Cited by 678
From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system
Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1302_4 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P.
- Venue
- Changing Assessments
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 37-75
- OpenAlex
- W1743495032
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 217.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_3
- The paper
- Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform. Changing Assessments. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
