Ernst Mach’s World Elements
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mach's elements push, pull and impede one another in dynamical complexes and can only be isolated from these complexes provisionally.
“Mach's elements Philosophical Psychology 175 push, pull and impede one another in dynamical complexes and can only be isolated from these complexes provisionally (Banks, 2003).”
From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003
Mach's ideal for physics was to replace the object-property ontology with a world of powers or world elements linked in functional relations, a power-ontology he believed held all the way down to a basic structure of nature more fundamental than atoms.
“Mach's ideal for physics, then, was to replace the object-property ontology with a world of powers, or world elements, linked to each other in functional relations, a power-ontology which Mach believed held all the way down to a basic structure of nature even more fundamental than atoms (Banks, 2003).”
From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003
Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics and philosophy of mind whose classic version was defended by Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell.
“Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics and philosophy of mind, the classic version of which was defended by Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell (Banks, 2003).”
From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003
There has recently been a modest revival of neutral monism deriving from a passage in Russell's Analysis of Matter.
“Recently, there has been a modest revival of the position deriving from a passage in Russell's (1927Russell's ( /1959) ) Analysis of Matter (see Banks, 2003Banks, , 2004;;Chalmers, 1996Chalmers, , 2003;;Holman, 2008;Lockwood, 1989;Maxwell, 1978;Rosenberg, 2004;Stoljar, 2001a;Strawson, 2006;and Unger, 1999, among others):”
From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003
It is a basic misunderstanding of neutral monism that it is a form of phenomenalism or idealism.
“This continues to be a basic misunderstanding of neutral monism, i.e., that it is a form of phenomenalism or idealism.”
From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banks, E. C. (2010) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515081003690418 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Banks, E. C.
- Corresponding author
- Banks, Erik C.
- Venue
- The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2003
- ISSN
- 1566-659X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2506840849
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
- Keywords
- Ernst Mach, philosophy of science, scientific realism, empiricism, epistemology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review