Cited by 91Philosophy, Science, and HistoryPhilosophy and History of SciencePhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis

Ernst Mach’s World Elements

Banks, Erik C.·2003·The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-0175-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mach's elements push, pull and impede one another in dynamical complexes and can only be isolated from these complexes provisionally.

    “Mach's elements Philosophical Psychology 175 push, pull and impede one another in dynamical complexes and can only be isolated from these complexes provisionally (Banks, 2003).”

    From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003

  • Mach's ideal for physics was to replace the object-property ontology with a world of powers or world elements linked in functional relations, a power-ontology he believed held all the way down to a basic structure of nature more fundamental than atoms.

    “Mach's ideal for physics, then, was to replace the object-property ontology with a world of powers, or world elements, linked to each other in functional relations, a power-ontology which Mach believed held all the way down to a basic structure of nature even more fundamental than atoms (Banks, 2003).”

    From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003

  • Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics and philosophy of mind whose classic version was defended by Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell.

    “Neutral monism is a position in metaphysics and philosophy of mind, the classic version of which was defended by Ernst Mach, William James, and Bertrand Russell (Banks, 2003).”

    From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003

  • There has recently been a modest revival of neutral monism deriving from a passage in Russell's Analysis of Matter.

    “Recently, there has been a modest revival of the position deriving from a passage in Russell's (1927Russell's ( /1959) ) Analysis of Matter (see Banks, 2003Banks, , 2004;;Chalmers, 1996Chalmers, , 2003;;Holman, 2008;Lockwood, 1989;Maxwell, 1978;Rosenberg, 2004;Stoljar, 2001a;Strawson, 2006;and Unger, 1999, among others):”

    From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks, 2003

  • It is a basic misunderstanding of neutral monism that it is a form of phenomenalism or idealism.

    “This continues to be a basic misunderstanding of neutral monism, i.e., that it is a form of phenomenalism or idealism.”

    From Neutral monism reconsidered (2010) · cites this paper as Banks (2003)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banks, E. C.
Corresponding author
Banks, Erik C.
Venue
The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science
Published
2003
ISSN
1566-659X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2506840849
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
Ernst Mach, philosophy of science, scientific realism, empiricism, epistemology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review