Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) Model: A New Theory of Success Among Racially Diverse College Student Populations

Museus, Samuel D.·2014·Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_5

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 155 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abraham, A. (1992). College remedial studies: Institutional practices in the SREB states. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
  2. Barnett, E. A. (2011a). Faculty validation and persistence among nontraditional community college students. Enrollment Management Journal: Student Access, Finance, and Success in Higher Education, 5(2), 97–119.
  3. Braxton, J. M. (2000). Introduction. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 1–8). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  4. Braxton, J. M., & Lien, L. A. (2000). The viability of academic integration as a central construct in Tinto’s interactionalist theory of student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 11–28). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  5. Burrell, L. F. (1980). Is there a future for Black students on predominantly White campuses? Integrate Education, 18, 23–27.
  6. Chancey, B., & Farris, E. (1991). Survey on retention at higher education institutions (Higher Education Abstracts No 14). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  7. Guiffrida, D. A., Kiyama, J. M., Waterman, S., & Museus, S. D. (2012). Moving from individual to collective cultures to serve students of color. In S. D. Museus & U. M. Jayakumar (Eds.), Creating campus cultures: Fostering success among racially diverse student populations (pp. 68–87). New York: Routledge.
  8. Heller, D. E. (2003). Informing public policy: Financial aid and student persistence. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
  9. Kiang, P. N. (2002). Stories and structures of persistence: Ethnographic learning through research and practice in Asian American Studies. In Y. Zou & H. T. Trueba (Eds.), Advances in ethnographic research: From our theoretical and methodological roots to post-modern critical ethnography (pp. 223–255). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  10. Kiang, P. N. (2009). A thematic analysis of persistence and long-term educational engagement with Southeast Asian American college students. In L. Zhan (Ed.), Asian American voices: Engaging, empowering, enabling (pp. 21–58). New York: NLN Press.
  11. Kuh, G. D., & Love, P. G. (2000). A cultural perspective on student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 196–212). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  12. McEwen, M. K., Roper, L. D., Bryant, D. R., & Langa, M. J. (1990). Incorporating the development of African American students into psychosocial theories of student development. Journal of College Student Development, 31(5), 429–436.
  13. Milem, J. F., Chang, M. J., & Antonio, A. L. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  14. Museus, S. D. (2008a). Focusing on institutional fabric: Using campus culture assessments to enhance cross-cultural engagement. In S. R. Harper (Ed.), Creating inclusive environments for cross-cultural learning and engagement in higher education (pp. 205–234). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
  15. Museus, S. D. (2011b). Using cultural perspectives to understand the role of ethnic student organizations in Black students’ progress to the end of the pipeline. In D. E. Evensen & C. D. Pratt (Eds.), The end of the pipeline: A journey of recognition for African Americans entering the legal profession (pp. 162–172). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
  16. Nora, A., Urick, A., & Cerecer, P. D. (2011). Validating students: A conceptualization and overview of its impact on student experiences and outcomes. Enrollment Management Journal: Student Access, Finance, and Success in Higher Education, 5(2), 97–119.
  17. St. John, E., & Starkey, J. (1995b). The influence of prices on the persistence of adult undergraduates. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 25(2), 7–17. · doi:10.55504/0884-9153.1135
  18. St. John, E. P., Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Asker, E. H. (2000). Economic influences on persistence reconsidered: How can finance research inform the reconceptualization of persistence models? In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 29–47). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  19. Swail, W. S. (2004). The art of student retention: A handbook for practitioners and administrators. Washington, DC: Education Policy Institute.

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Museus, S. D.
Venue
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research
Published
2013-12-30
Pages
189-227
ISSN
0882-4126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W33503936
Cited by
322
References
155
FWCI
19.19
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) Model: A New Theory of Success Among Racially Diverse College Student Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_5
The paper
Museus, S. D. (2014). The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) Model: A New Theory of Success Among Racially Diverse College Student Populations. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.