The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries
Open accessAbstract
Empirical research on gender dimensions in agricultural inputs has focused on land. This chapter reviews existing microeconomic empirical literature from the past 10 years on gender differences in use, access, and adoption of nonland agricultural inputs in developing countries. The review focuses on three key areas: (1) technological resources, (2) natural resources, and (3) human resources. In general, there has been more empirical research on inorganic fertilizer, seed varieties, and extension services than on tools and mechanization and life-cycle effects, and most of the studies are from Sub-Saharan Africa. A consistent finding is that, across different types of inputs, men generally have higher input measures than women, and that this input gap is responsible for observed productivity differences between men and women; however, this finding is often sensitive to the use of models that control for other background factors, as well as the type of gender indicator implemented in the analysis. The final section presents future directions, opportunities, and recommendations for microeconomic gender analysis of nonland agricultural inputs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woman's Role in Economic Development
Boserup, E., Tan, S. F., & Toulmin, C. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315065892 · Cited by 1,060
Woman's Role in Economic Development
P., H., & Boserup, E. (1972) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1529639 · Cited by 732
Doss, C. (2001) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-5150(00)00096-7 · Cited by 669
Rethinking the global food crisis: The role of trade shocks
Headey, D. (2011) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10.003 · Cited by 590
Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., & Nkuba, J. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.019 · Cited by 561
Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.006 · Cited by 542
Self-citationDo Women’s Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal?
Allendorf, K. (2007) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.12.005 · Cited by 531
Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya
Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013 · Cited by 462
Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/1471-0366.00051 · Cited by 457 · cited 1×
“In fact, without attention to the larger scope of gender relations, interventions to provide equal access to inputs and resources have in certain cases led to increased conflict (see, for example, Lastarria-Cornhiel, 1997; Tripp, 2004; Whitehead and Tsikata, 2003).”
BackgroundGender in Agriculture Sourcebook
Bank, W., Food and Agriculture Organization, & Development, I. F. F. A. (2008) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7587-7 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Gender Differences in Access to Extension Services and Agricultural Productivity
Ragasa, C., Berhane, G., Tadesse, F., & Taffesse, A. S. (2013) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2013.817343 · Cited by 288
Andersson, E. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.070 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterman, A., Behrman, J. A., & Quisumbing, A. R.
- Venue
- Gender in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 145-186
- OpenAlex
- W1589015423
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 148.81
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_7
- The paper
- Peterman, A., Behrman, J. A., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries. Gender in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8616-4_7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.