Cited by 563Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural Development and ManagementAgricultural Research and Practices

Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural productivity and poverty in East Africa

Open access
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D.A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., Nkuba, J.·2012·World Development

Abstract

The authors used a longitudinal impact evaluation with quasi-experimental methods to provide evidence on economic and production impact of a farmer field school (FFS) project in East Africa. FFSs were shown to have positive impact on production and income among women, low-literacy, and medium land size farmers. Participation in FFS increased income by 61%. Participation in FFS improved agricultural income and crop productivity overall. This implies that farmer field schools are a useful approach to increase production and income of small-scale farmers in East Africa, and that the approach can be used to target women and producers with limited literacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.019

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overarching aim of extension is to improve farmers' decision-making and analytical skills, as well as to reduce information constraints associated with the adoption of new technologies.

    “The overarching aim of extension is to improve farmers' decision-making and analytical skills, as well as to reduce information constraints associated with the adoption of new technologies (Chavas and Nauges, 2020;Davis et al., 2012;Norton and Alwang, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, K., Nkonya, E., Kato, E., Mekonnen, D. A., Odendo, M., Miiro, R., & Nkuba, J.
Affiliations
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
  • Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KE)
  • Makerere University (UG)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
402-413
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107339504
Cited by
561
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
81.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Research and Practices
Keywords
farmer field schools, agricultural productivity, poverty reduction, smallholder farmers, farm income, women farmers, agricultural extension, East Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review