Cited by 122Environmental Impact and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Challenges in Life Cycle Assessment: An Overview of Current Gaps and Research Needs

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_7

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 213 references

1 of the 213 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Ackermann R, Bergmann T, Finkbeiner M (2009) Yin-/Yang-concept of environmental sustainability assessment. In: Shunmugam MS, Babu NR (eds) 7th global Conference on sustainable manufacturing, Chennai
  2. Arnett EB, Strickland MD, Morrison ML (2007) Renewable energy resources and wildlife: impacts and opportunities. Transactions of the 72nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference
  3. Baker J, Lepech M (2009) Treatment of uncertainties in life cyle assessment. Stanford University, Stanford
  4. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST (2002) Air pollution and health. The Lancet 360(9341):1233–1242. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8 · DOI
  5. Curran MA (2007) Co-product and input allocation approaches for creating life cycle inventory data—a literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):65–78
  6. Curran MA, Mann M, Norris GA (2001) Report on the international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories Available via EPA http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1001NRO.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2013
  7. EEA (2012) The impacts of endocrine disrupters on wildlife, people and their environments. European Environmental Agency (EEA) Technical Report. doi:10.2800/41462 · DOI
  8. Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2009) Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review. J Clean Prod 9:197–208 · DOI
  9. Ernstoff A (2012) Direct consumer exposure during use of personal care products, plasticizers and flooring materials. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on EcoBalance, Yokohama, Japan
  10. Gamarra P, Salhofer S (2007) A comparison of waste management in Peru and some Latin-American countries: an overview of major problems, characteristiccs and real needs in the region. In: Diaz LF, Eggerth LL, Savage GM (eds) Management of solid wastes in developing countries. IWWG Task group on waste management in developing countries. CISA Publisher, Padova, pp 71–81
  11. Henzen C (2008) The impact of land use on biodiversity in the framework of life cycle assessment. University of Basel, Basel
  12. Howard N, Kneppers B (2011) Weighting for LCA based tools, methods and ecolabels—practical but contentious! http://www.conference.alcas.asn.au/2011/HowardKneppers.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2013
  13. IPCC (2001) Third assessment report—climate change. Cambridge University Press
  14. Jannick H Schmidt JR, Bo PW (2012) A model of indirect land use change. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2012), 1–4 October 2012, Saint Malo, France. INRA, Rennes, France, p 7
  15. Meijer A (2007) The significance of indoor air emissions in life cycle assessment of dwellings. International Conference Sustainable Urban Areas, Netherlands
  16. Milà i Canals L (2007) Land use in LCA—a new subject area and call for papers (editorial). Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):1 · DOI
  17. Notten P, Petrie J (2003) An integrated approach to uncertainty assessment in LCA. In: International workshop on LCI-quality, Karlsruhe, 20–21 October
  18. NRMMC (2006) Australian guideline for water recycling: managing health and environmental risks (phase 1). National water quality management strategy 21. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, Environment Protection and Heritage Council, Australian Health Ministers Conference, Canberra
  19. OED (2013) Oxford dictionairies: “improbable”. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/improbable?q=improbable+. Accessed 20 Mar 2013
  20. Schneider L, Berger M, Finkeiner M (2012) Measuring material scarcity—limited availability despite sufficient reserves. Paper presented at the European Commission Joint Research Centre Workshop: Security of supply and scarcity of raw materials: a methodological framework for supply chain sustainability assessment, November 13–14, Ranco
  21. UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Druk in deweer, Belgium
  22. UNEP/SETAC (2011b) Towards a life cycle sustainability—making informed choices on products. Druk in de weer, Belgium
  23. Weidema BP, Wesnaes M, Hermansen J, Kristensen T, Halberg N (2008) Environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products (EUR 23491 EN). European Commission, Joint research centre (JRC), Institute for prospective technological studies (IPTS), Sevilla

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–122 of 122

Metadata

Authors
Finkbeiner, M., Ackermann, R., Bach, V., Berger, M., Brankatschk, G., Chang, Y.-J., Grinberg, M., Lehmann, A., Martínez-Blanco, J., Minkov, N., Neugebauer, S., Scheumann, R., Schneider, L., & Wolf, K.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Finkbeiner, Matthias
Venue
LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2014
Pages
207-258
ISSN
  • 2214-3505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-3513
OpenAlex
W197791078
Cited by
122
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
25.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
LCA compendium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Keywords
research needs, allocation methods, uncertainty, biodiversity impacts, littering, animal welfare, positive effects, inventory data, impact assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review