CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative research in healthQualitative Research Methods and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Researcher Positionality in Cross-Cultural and Sensitive Research

Manohar, Narendar, Liamputtong, Pranee, Bhole, Sameer, Arora, Amit·2019·Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_35
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_35

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Al-Makhamreh SS, Lewando-Hundt G. Researching at home as an insider/outsider: gender and culture in an ethnographic study of social work practice in an Arab society. Qual Soc Work. 2008;7(1):9–23. · DOI
  2. Al-Natour RJ. The impact of the researcher on the researched. J Media Culture. 2011;14(6). Retrieved from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/428 · DOI
  3. Arora A, McNab MA, Lewis MW, Hilton G, Blinkhorn AS, Schwarz E. ‘I can’t relate it to teeth’: a qualitative approach to evaluate oral health education materials for preschool children in New South Wales, Australia. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012a;22(4):302–9. · DOI
  4. Arora A, Liu MN, Chan R, Schwarz E. ‘English leaflets are not meant for me’: a qualitative approach to explore oral health literacy in Chinese mothers in Southwestern Sydney, Australia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012b;40(6):532–41. · DOI
  5. Arora A, Nguyen D, Do QV, Nguyen B, Hilton G, Do LG, Bhole S. ‘What do these words mean?’: a qualitative approach to explore oral health literacy in Vietnamese immigrant mothers in Australia. Health Educ J. 2014;73(3):303–12. · DOI
  6. Banks JA. The lives and values of researchers: implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educ Res. 1998;27(7):4–17. · DOI
  7. Bishop R. Freeing ourselves from neocolonial domination in research: a Maori approach to creating knowledge. In: Denzin Y, Lincoln Y, editors. The landscape of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousands Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 145–83.
  8. Bourke B. Positionality: reflecting on the research process. Qual Rep. 2014;19(33):1–9.
  9. Brandes S. The things we carry. Men Masculinities. 2008;11(2):145–53. · DOI
  10. Breen LJ. The researcher ‘in the middle’: negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy. Aust Community Psychol. 2007;19(1):163–74.
  11. Chawla D. Subjectivity and the “native” ethnographer: researcher eligibility in an ethnographic study of urban Indian women in Hindu arranged marriages. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(4):13–29. · DOI
  12. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 7th ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011.
  13. Cresswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2017.
  14. Edmonds-Cady C. A view from the bridge: insider/outsider perspective in a study of the welfare rights movement. Qual Soc Work. 2012;11(2):174–90. · DOI
  15. Egharevba I. Researching an-‘other’ minority ethnic community: reflections of a black female researcher on the intersections of race, gender and other power positions on the research process. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2001;4(3):225–41. · DOI
  16. England KV. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Prof Geogr. 1994;46(1):80–9. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Enguix B. Negotiating the field: rethinking ethnographic authority, experience and the frontiers of research. Qual Res. 2012;14(1):79–94. · DOI
  18. Ergun A, Erdemir A. Negotiating insider and outsider identities in the field: “Insider” in a foreign land; “outsider” in one’s own land. Field Methods. 2010;22(1):16–38. · DOI
  19. Finch J. Its great to have someone to talk to: the ethics and politics of interviewing women. In: Hammersley M, editor. Social research, philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage; 1993. p. 166–80.
  20. Fletcher T. ‘Does he look like a Paki?’: an exploration of ‘whiteness’, positionality and reflexivity in inter-racial sports research. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2014;6(2):244–60. · DOI
  21. Galam RG. Gender, reflexivity, and positionality in male research in one’s own community with Filipino seafarers’ wives. Forum Qual Soz Forsch Forum Qual Soc Res. 2015;16(3):26–51.
  22. Ganga D, Scott S. Cultural “insiders” and the issue of positionality in qualitative migration research: moving “across” and moving “along” researcher-participant divides. Forum Qual Soz Forsch Forum Qual Soc Res. 2006;7(3):9–20.
  23. Gill F, Maclean C. Knowing your place: gender and reflexivity in two ethnographies. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, editors. Sage qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011. p. 2–18.
  24. Hayfield N, Huxley C. Insider and outsider perspectives: reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):91–106. · DOI
  25. Hoskins K. Researching female professors: the difficulties of representation, positionality and power in feminist research. Gend Educ. 2015;27(4):393–411. · DOI
  26. Järviluoma H, Moisala P, Vilkko A. Gender and qualitative methods. London: Sage; 2004.
  27. Kezar A. Reconstructing static images of leadership: an application of positionality theory. J Leadersh Org Stud. 2002;8(3):94–109. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kusek WA, Smiley SL. Navigating the city: gender and positionality in cultural geography research. J Cult Geogr. 2014;31(2):152–65. · DOI
  29. Kusow AM. Beyond indigenous authenticity: reflections on the insider/outsider debate in immigration research. Symb Interact. 2003;26(4):591–9. · DOI
  30. Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007. · DOI
  31. Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. · DOI
  32. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  33. Manohar NN. ‘Yes you’re Tamil! But are you Tamil enough?’ An Indian researcher interrogates ‘shared social location’ in feminist immigration research. Int J Mult Res Approaches. 2013;7(2):189–203. · DOI
  34. Maylor U. Is it because I’m black? A black female research experience. Race Ethn Educ. 2009;12(1):53–64. · DOI
  35. Mellor J, Ingram N, Abrahams J, Beedell P. Class matters in the interview setting? Positionality, situatedness and class. Br Educ Res J. 2014;40(1):135–49. · DOI
  36. Merriam SB, Johnson-Bailey J, Lee M-Y, Kee Y, Ntseane G, Muhamad M. Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2001;20(5):405–16. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pante MBLP. Female researchers in a masculine space: managing discomforts and negotiating positionalities. Philipp Sociol Rev. 2014;62:65–88. · DOI
  38. Pasquini MW, Olaniyan O. The researcher and the field assistant: a cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural viewing of positionality. Interdiscip Sci Rev. 2004;29(1):24–36. · DOI
  39. Pingol A. Remaking masculinities: identity, power, and gender dynamics in families with migrant wives and househusbands. Quezon City: University Center for Women’s Studies/University of Philippines; 2001.
  40. Ramji H. Exploring commonality and difference in in-depth interviewing: a case-study of researching British Asian women. Br J Sociol. 2008;59(1):99–116. · DOI
  41. Rashid SF. Accessing married adolescent women: the realities of ethnographic research in an urban slum environment in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Field Methods. 2007;19(4):369–83. · DOI
  42. Riessman CK. Narrative approaches to trauma. In: Riessman CK, editor. Qualitative studies in social work research. London: Sage; 1994. p. 67–71.
  43. Savin-Baden M, Major CH. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
  44. Shariff F. Establishing field relations through shared ideology: insider self-positioning as a precarious/productive foundation in multisited studies. Field Methods. 2014;26(1):3–20. · DOI
  45. Sikes P. Methodology, procedures and ethical concerns. In: Clive O, editor. Doing educational research: a guide to first-time researchers. London: Sage; 2004. p. 15–33. · DOI
  46. Stiedenroth KS. Female, young, unmarried: the role of positionality while conducting fieldwork in Pakistan. Orient Anthropol. 2014;14(1):81–95. · DOI
  47. Suwankhong D, Liamputtong P. Cultural insiders and research fieldwork: case examples from cross-cultural research with Thai people. Int J Qual Methods. 2015;14(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621404. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Takeda A. Reflexivity: unmarried Japanese male interviewing married Japanese women about international marriage. Qual Res. 2012;13(3):285–98. · DOI
  49. Tillman LC. Culturally sensitive research approaches: an African-American perspective. Educ Res. 2002;31(9):3–12. · DOI
  50. Underwood M, Satterthwait LD, Bartlett HP. Reflexivity and minimization of the impact of age-cohort differences between researcher and research participants. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(11):1585–95. · DOI
  51. Wegener C. ‘Would you like a cup of coffee?’ Using the researcher’s insider and outsider positions as a sensitising concept. Ethnogr Educ. 2014;9(2):153–66. · DOI
  52. Yakushko O, Badiee M, Mallory A, Wang S. Insider outsider: reflections on working with one’s own communities. Women Ther. 2011;34(3):279–92. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Manohar, N., Liamputtong, P., Bhole, S., & Arora, A.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Arora, Amit
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published
2019
Pages
1601-1616
DOI
10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_35
OpenAlex
W2910631566
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
21.22
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative research in health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
researcher positionality, insider and outsider status, cross-cultural research, sensitive research, gender, age, ethnicity and culture, social class, collective experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review