Cited by 15Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid in vivo

Latikka, Juha, Eskola, Hannu·2019·IFMBE Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_142

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Latikka, J., & Eskola, H.
Affiliations
Tampere University of Technology (FI)
Corresponding author
Latikka, Juha
Venue
IFMBE Proceedings
Published
2018-05-30
Pages
773-776
ISSN
  • 1433-9277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-0737
OpenAlex
W2809756860
Cited by
15
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid, electrical conductivity, needle electrode, brain tumor surgery, meningioma, glioma, volume conductor model, current distribution, blood contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review