Cited by 18Retinal and Macular SurgeryIntraocular Surgery and LensesRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Robot-assisted retinal surgery: overcoming human limitations

Open access
Xue, K., Edwards, T. L., Meenink, H. C. M., Beelen, M. J., Naus, G. J. L., Simunovic, M. P., de Smet, M. D., MacLaren, R. E.·2019·Retina Atlas

Abstract

Robotics offer the potential to improve the precision and safety of retinal surgery. The starting point of advanced mechanical assistance in vitreoretinal surgery may be traced back to the invention of the motorized vitreous cutter by Machemer in the 1970s [1]. This revolutionized vitreoretinal surgical techniques and made it possible to treat complex retinal detachments, vitreous haemorrhage, epiretinal membranes and macular holes. Over the last decade, the use of vital dyes to stain retinal membranes has further improved the safety of some of the most intricate surgical steps such as peeling internal limiting membrane (ILM), stripping epiretinal membrane (ERM) and removing proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), but minor retinal trauma remains inevitable even in experienced hands. Further improvements in the precision of retinal surgery are limited by human physiology, not only in terms of hand tremor and stability but also the resolving power of human vision even with the aid of the operating microscope. Modern laser-based in vivo imaging techniques such as intraoperative OCT can provide histological levels of detail, yet the limitations of human depth perception and hand-eye coordination mean that it remains a challenge for a surgeon to translate detailed imaging information into enhanced surgical performance. Various types of robotic assistance could help propel intraocular surgery beyond these human physiological limitations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-13-6214-9_11

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xue, K., Edwards, T. L., Meenink, H. C. M., Beelen, M. J., Naus, G. J. L., Simunovic, M. P., de Smet, M. D., & MacLaren, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
MacLaren, R. E.
Venue
Retina Atlas
Published
2019
Pages
109-114
ISSN
  • 2662-5741 (ISSN-L)
  • 2662-575X
OpenAlex
W2945237863
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Retina atlas (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
robotic surgery, vitrectomy, retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane, macular hole, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, internal limiting membrane peeling, surgical precision, hand tremor, depth perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review