Cited by 51Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology in LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education: Speculative Futures and Emerging Practices

Maggi Savin‐Baden, D. Burden, Roy Bhakta, Victoria Mason-Robbie·2019·Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savin‐Baden, M., Burden, D., Bhakta, R., & Mason-Robbie, V.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Venue
Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education
Published
2019
ISSN
  • 2366-1658 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-1666
OpenAlex
W2972712228
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.75
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education (publishedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, inclusive education, future of teaching and learning, diversity in education, multicultural classrooms, linguistic diversity, emotional diversity, social diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review