Cited by 6Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Signaling Matters: Radically Open-Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa

Lynch, Thomas R., Hempel, Roelie J.·2017·Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-287-104-6_163

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lynch, T. R., & Hempel, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Thomas R.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders
Published
2017
Pages
773-782
OpenAlex
W4256344432
Cited by
6
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, overcontrol, signaling, transdiagnostic treatment, treatment-resistant depression, chronic depression, treatment-resistant eating disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review