Cited by 4Environmental remediation with nanomaterialsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Sustainable Nanomaterials in Wastewater Remediation

Mitra, Amrit Krishna, Nayak, Saikat·2025·Advances in Wastewater Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-96-3908-3_7

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incomplete recovery of nanomaterials may lead to unintended release of residual nanomaterials into water bodies, raising significant ecotoxicological and health concerns.

    “Moreover, incomplete recovery may lead to the unintended release of residual nanomaterials into water bodies, raising significant ecotoxicological and health concerns.244,248”
  • The extremely small particle size and high dispersibility of nanomaterials complicate conventional recovery methods such as filtration or sedimentation, which often fail to achieve quantitative recovery.

    “The extremely small particle size and high dispersibility of nanomaterials complicate conventional recovery methods such as filtration or sedimentation, which often fail to achieve quantitative recovery.62,244”
  • Despite promising adsorption capabilities and surface functionalities, large-scale application of nanoadsorbents remains hindered by challenges associated with recyclability, structural deterioration, and declining performance upon repeated use.

    “Despite the promising adsorption capabilities and surface functionalities exhibited by various nanoadsorbents, their large-scale application remains hindered by challenges associated with recyclability, structural deterioration, and declining performance upon repeated use.”
  • For nanofibrous and porous materials, repeated exposure to wastewater can induce shrinkage, deformation, and microstructural weakening, compromising mechanical stability and adsorption efficiency.

    “For nanofibrous and porous materials, repeated exposure to wastewater can also induce shrinkage, deformation, and microstructural weakening, compromising both mechanical stability and adsorption efficiency.244”
  • One of the foremost operational challenges in nanoadsorbent recycling is the efficient separation and recovery of nanosized particles from treated effluents.

    “One of the foremost operational challenges in nanoadsorbent recycling is the efficient separation and recovery of nanosized particles from treated effluents.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitra, A. K., & Nayak, S.
Affiliations
  • Government of West Bengal (IN)
  • Rani Rashmoni Green University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mitra, Amrit Krishna
Venue
Advances in Wastewater Research
Published
2025
Pages
159-188
ISSN
  • 3004-9725
  • 3004-9733
OpenAlex
W4411740890
Cited by
4
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
9.06
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
nanomaterials, wastewater treatment, green nanotechnology, adsorption, heavy metal removal, covalent organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, metal oxide nanoparticles, graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, magnetic nanoparticles, copper removal, phenol adsorption, iron oxide, emerging contaminants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review