Cited by 381Social Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status DynamicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Social Networks and Trust

Vincent Buskens·2002·Theory and Decision Library C:

Abstract

Social Networks and Trust discusses two possible explanations for the emergence of trust via social networks. If network members can sanction untrustworthiness of actors, these actors may refrain from

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b109038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of trust can lead to insurmountable barriers inhibiting transactions.

    “A lack of trust can therefore lead to insurmountable barriers inhibiting transactions (Buskens, 2002).”

    From Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as Buskens, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buskens, V.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vincent Buskens
Venue
Theory and Decision Library C:
Published
2002
OpenAlex
W1584498766
Cited by
381
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
23.59
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
social networks, trust, sanctioning, trustworthiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review