Cited by 246Visual perception and processing mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex

Open access
Hindy, Nicholas C, Ng, Felicia Y, Turk-Browne, Nicholas B·2016·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Models of predictive coding frame perception as a generative process in which expectations constrain sensory representations. These models account for expectations about how a stimulus will move or change from moment to moment, but do not address expectations about what other, distinct stimuli are likely to appear based on prior experience. We show that such memory-based expectations in human visual cortex are related to the hippocampal mechanism of pattern completion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4284

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A putative memory-based predictive-coding retrieval mechanism has been identified in the human hippocampus, where engrams of compound patterns are identified or completed and sent to cortex to construct perceptual predictions.

    “A putative memory-based predictive-coding retrieval mechanism was recently identified in the human hippocampus, where engrams of compound patterns are identified (or completed, in situations in which the input is partial), and then sent to the cortex in order to construct perceptual predictions regarding the sensory inputs (Hindy et al., 2016).”

    From The Transition to Minimal Consciousness through the Evolution of Associative Learning (2016) · cites this paper as Hindy et al., 2016

    The Abstract describes hippocampal pattern completion as a candidate mechanism: partial input can activate a representation of an entire experience, which may support expectations in visual cortex. But the paper says its findings only suggest this mechanism and that fMRI cannot establish the direction of information transfer; the claim overstates it as an identified process in which representations are sent to cortex. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Cohen NJ Eichenbaum H MIT Press: 1993
  2. [20]Duvernoy HM Springer: 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hindy, N. C., Ng, F. Y., & Turk-Browne, N. B.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Hindy, Nicholas C
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2016-04-11
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
665-667
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2325506870
Cited by
246
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Princeton University
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od016277-01)
  • National Eye Institute (F32EY023162, R01EY021755)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
pattern completion, predictive coding, hippocampus, visual cortex, perceptual expectations, prior experience, hippocampal subfields, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review