Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,097

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology

Chapin, F. Stuart, Matson, Pamela A., Mooney, Harold A.·2002·Springer eBooks

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b97397

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory

    Polis, G. A. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285208 · Cited by 1,041 · cited 2×

    “Some of the questions addressed by systems ecology include information transfer (Margalef 1968), the structure of food webs (Polis 1991), the hierarchical changes in ecosystem controls at different temporal and spatial scales (O’Neill et al. 1986), and the resilience of ecosystem properties after…”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,097

Metadata

Authors
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2002
OpenAlex
W4230083568
Cited by
2,097
References
1
FWCI
29.88
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/b97397
The paper
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97397

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.