Cited by 1,354Natural Language Processing TechniquesSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure

Open access
Elman, Jeffrey L.·1991·Machine Learning

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00114844

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Fauconnier, G. (1985) Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Forster, K.I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper, & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. HiUsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Hornik, K., Stinehcombe, M., & White, H. (in press). Multi-layer feedforward networks are universal approx- imators. Neural Networks.
  4. Kirsh, D. (in press). When is information represented explicitly? In J. Hanson (Ed.), Information, thought, and content. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  5. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical perspectives. Volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  6. Pollack, J.B. (1988). Recursive auto-associative memory: Decising compositional distributed representations. Pro- ceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  7. Ramsey, W. (1989). The philosophical implications ofconnectionism. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
  8. Reich, P.A., & Dell, G.S. (1977). Finiteness and embedding. In E.L. Blansitt, Jr., & P. Maher (Eds.), The third LACUS forum. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
  9. John, M., & MeClelland, J.L. (in press). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence compre- hension (Technical Report). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
  10. Touretzky, D.S. (1986). BoltzCONS: Reconciling connectionism with the recursive nature of stacks and trees. Proceedings of the Eight Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbanm.
  11. Touretzky, D.S. (1989). Towards a connectionist phonology: The "many maps" approach to sequence manipula- tion. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 188-195.
  12. Van Gelder, T.J. (in press). Compositionality: Variations on a classical theme. Cognitive Science.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elman, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Elman, Jeffrey L.
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
1991-09
Volume
7
Issue
2-3
Pages
195-225
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W2087946919
Cited by
1,354
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 38
FWCI
53.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
distributed representations, Elman neural network, grammatical structure, phrase structure, relative clauses, linguistic representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review