Cited by 166Advanced Vision and ImagingVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

On the relative complexity of active vs. passive visual search

Tsotsos, John K.·1992·International Journal of Computer Vision

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00128132

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsotsos, J. K.
Affiliations
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Tsotsos, John K.
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
1992-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
127-141
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W1986099000
Cited by
164
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
active vision, visual search, computational complexity, active perception, attention, data acquisition control, behaviorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review