The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persuasive argumentation in negotiation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,535
Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781036 · Cited by 3,155
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048153 · Cited by 1,700
Group decision support systems: a new frontier
DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, B. (1984) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1040688.1040689 · Cited by 393
A process model of cased-based reasoning in problem solving
Kolodner, J. L., Simpson, R. L., & Sycara-Cyranski, K. (1985) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 152
NEGO — Group decision support system
Kersten, G. E. (1985) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/0378-7206(85)90001-1 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation
Shehory, O., & Kraus, S. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00045-9 · Cited by 1,080
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001 · Cited by 803
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
“R [159], tuProlog [122], Xsb [309], YAP Prolog [93] No logic AGENTFLY [322], Aglets [221], CArtAgO [298], ConArg [38], cougaar [173], JaCaMo [41], JADE-JBossESB [346], JACKAL [92], Klaim [115], Magentix2 [328], MASON [238], Moise & S-Moise+ [193], Presage2 [71], RETSINA [329], SARL APL [302] Technology not found ABLE…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sycara, K. P.
- Venue
- Theory and Decision
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-242
- ISSN
- 0040-5833 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7187
- OpenAlex
- W2038577305
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00162699
- The paper
- Sycara, K. P. (1990). Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00162699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.