The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Hawks and Doves: Factors Affecting Success and Selection in Goshawk Attacks on Woodpigeons
Kenward, R. E. (1978) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3793 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation
Brown, J. S., & Kotler, B. P. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x · Cited by 1,121
Vigilance Behaviour in African Ungulates: The Role of Predation Pressure
Hunter, & Skinner (1998) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853998793066320 · Cited by 379
Hebblewhite, M., Merrill, E. H., & McDonald, T. L. (2005) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13858.x · Cited by 342
Childress, M. J., & Lung, M. A. (2003) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2217 · Cited by 304
Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep
RUCKSTUHL, K. E. (1998) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0745 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Delm, M.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0762
- OpenAlex
- W1995596782
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00171099
- The paper
- Delm, M. (1990). Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00171099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
