The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation
Abstract
We review the concepts and research associated with measuring fear and its consequences for foraging. When foraging, animals should and do demand hazardous duty pay. They assess a foraging cost of predation to compensate for the risk of predation or the risk of catastrophic injury. Similarly, in weighing foraging options, animals tradeoff food and safety. The foraging cost of predation can be modelled, and it can be quantitatively and qualitatively measured using risk titrations. Giving‐up densities (GUDs) in depletable food patches and the distribution of foragers across safe and risky feeding opportunities are two frequent experimental tools for titrating food and safety. A growing body of literature shows that: (i) the cost of predation can be big and comprise the forager's largest foraging cost, (ii) seemingly small changes in habitat or microhabitat characteristics can lead to large changes in the cost of predation, and (iii) a forager's cost of predation rises with risk of mortality, the forager's energy state and a decrease in its marginal value of energy. In titrating for the cost of predation, researchers have investigated spatial and temporal variation in risk, scale‐dependent variation in risk, and the role of predation risk in a forager's ecology. A risk titration from a feeding animal often provides a more accurate behavioural indicator of predation risk than direct observations of predator‐inflicted mortality. Titrating for fear responses in foragers has some well‐established applications and holds promise for novel methodologies, concepts and applications. Future directions for expanding conceptual and empirical tools include: what are the consequences of foraging costs arising from interference behaviours and other sources of catastrophic loss? Are there alternative routes by which organisms can respond to tradeoffs of food and safety? What does an animal's landscape of fear look like as a spatially explicit map, and how do various environmental factors affect it? Behavioural titrations will help to illuminate these issues and more.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus
Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-092 · Cited by 8,196
Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1969) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/bf01601953 · Cited by 3,138
Size, Function, and Life History
Calder, W. A. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,864
POPULATIONS IN A SEASONAL ENVIRONMENT
Cody, M. L., & Fretwell, S. D. (1973) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1973.tb00680.x · Cited by 1,788
Populations in a Seasonal Environment.
Cody, M. L., & Fretwell, S. D. (1973) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406975 · Cited by 1,681
Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis
Lima, S. L., & Bednekoff, P. A. (1999) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303202 · Cited by 1,484
Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition
Brown, J. S. (1988) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00395696 · Cited by 1,401
Self-citationEcological Bases of Hormone—Behavior Interactions: The “Emergency Life History Stage”
WINGFIELD, J. C., MANEY, D. L., BREUNER, C. W., JACOBS, J. D., LYNN, S., RAMENOFSKY, M., & RICHARDSON, R. D. (1998) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/38.1.191 · Cited by 1,376
Lima, S. L. (1998) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60366-6 · Cited by 1,336
Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.
Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L., & Altendorf, K. B. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z01-094 · Cited by 1,216
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00122-5 · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00122-5
- Bertram B.C.R., 1978, Behavioural Ecology, 64
- Brown J.S., 1998, Game Theory and Animal Behavior, 188, 10.1093/oso/9780195096927.003.0009 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195096927.003.0009
- Brown J.S., 1992, Patch use under predation risk: II. A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger, Ann. Zoolog. Fenni., 29, 311
- Brown J.S., 1998, Patch use in the pygmy rock mouse (Petromyscus collinus), Mammalia, 62, 108
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80776-6 · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80776-6
- 10.2307/3546222 · doi:10.2307/3546222
- Dall S.R.X., 2001, Attention, ‘apprehension’ and gerbils searching in patches, Ann. Zool. Fenni., 38, 15
- 10.1086/324124 · doi:10.1086/324124
- Guerrieri E., 1999, Induction and systemic release of herbivore_induced plant volatiles mediating in_flight orientation of Aphidius ervi, J. Chem. Ecol., 25, 1247, 10.1023/A:1020914506782 · doi:10.1023/a:1020914506782
- Gurung M.(2003).Ecology of fear: a case study of blue sheep and snow leopards in the Nepal Himalayas.PhD Dissertation University of Illinois Chicago IL.
- 10.2307/1382372 · doi:10.2307/1382372
- 10.2307/1369870 · doi:10.2307/1369870
- 10.2307/1380824 · doi:10.2307/1380824
- 10.2307/3566056 · doi:10.2307/3566056
- 10.2307/3565657 · doi:10.2307/3565657
- Linder Y.(1988).Seasonal differences in thermoregulation inGerbillus allenbyiandGerbillus pyramidumand their contribution to energy budgets.MSc thesis Ben‐Gurion University Beer Sheva Israel (in Hebrew with English abstract).
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81023-1 · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)81023-1
- 10.2307/1941473 · doi:10.2307/1941473
- 10.2307/2265737 · doi:10.2307/2265737
- Olsson O., 2001, Gain curves in depletable food patches: a test of five models with European starlings, Evol. Ecol. Res., 3, 285
- 10.1006/anbe.2001.1985 · doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1985
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12657.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12657.x
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80670-0 · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80670-0
- 10.1016/0022-0981(93)90219-E · doi:10.1016/0022-0981(93)90219-e
Cited by
Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems
Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Anderies, J. M., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., & Nilon, C. H. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6 · Cited by 567
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“A competing hypothesis is that predation risk promotes the distinct habitat partitioning observed in desert rodents (Kotler 1984, Brown and Kotler 2004).”
BackgroundResultMeta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems
Verdolin, J. L. (2006) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0172-6 · Cited by 490
Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system
Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., Smith, D. W., Stahler, D. R., MacNulty, D. R., & Boyce, M. S. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01059.x · Cited by 350
Creel, S., Schuette, P., & Christianson, D. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru050 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. S., & Kotler, B. P.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 999-1014
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2146706104
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x
- The paper
- Brown, J. S., & Kotler, B. P. (2004). Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.