CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii

von der Emde, Gerhard, Bleckmann, Horst·1992·Journal of Comparative Physiology A
DOI 10.1007/bf00194116
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00194116

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A- and B-cells encode different features of the EOD and project to separate regions of the electrosensory lobe (ELL).

    “A- and B-cells encode different features of the EOD (see Section 3) and project to separate regions of the electrosensory lobe (ELL), the first stage of electrosensory processing in the fish’s brain [10, 11, 12, 13].”

    From An end-to-end model of active electrosensation (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

  • A precise description of the stimulus features encoded by A- and B-type receptors is lacking.

    “but a precise description of the stimulus features encoded by A- and B-type receptors is lacking [10, 12, 13, 17].”

    From An end-to-end model of active electrosensation (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

  • A-type receptors are primarily sensitive to changes in EOD amplitude, whereas B-type receptors respond to both amplitude and waveform changes.

    “Prior electrophysiological recordings have shown that A-type receptors are primarily sensitive to changes in EOD amplitude, whereas B-type receptors respond to both amplitude and waveform changes, but a precise description of the stimulus features encoded by A- and B-type receptors is lacking [10, 12, 13, 17].”

    From An end-to-end model of active electrosensation (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
von der Emde, G., & Bleckmann, H.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
ORCID
Bleckmann, Horst
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1992-09
Volume
171
Issue
5
Pages
683-694
ISSN
  • 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1351
DOI
10.1007/bf00194116
OpenAlex
W2020990463
Cited by
68
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
Gnathonemus petersii, electroreception, signal distortion, electric organ discharge, first-spike latency, spike number, phase shift, amplitude modulation, weakly electric fish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review