Cited by 215Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques

Methodology for detecting swallowing sounds

Takahashi, Koji, Groher, MichaelE., Michi, Ken-ichi·1994·Dysphagia

Abstract

The use of cervical auscultation in the evaluation of the pharyngeal swallow may become a part of the clinical evaluation of dysphagic patients. Though its use is based on subjective evaluation, an acoustic analysis of swallowing sounds might establish more objective criteria in the detection of swallowing disorders. The present study sought to investigate three aspects of the methodology for detecting swallowing sounds: (1) the type of acoustic detector unit suited to an acoustic analysis of the pharyngeal swallow, (2) the type of adhesive suited for the attachment of the detector, and (3) the optimal site for sound detection of the pharyngeal swallow. An accelerometer with double-sided paper tape was selected as the appropriate detector unit because of its wide range of frequency response and small attenuation level. Using this detector unit, swallowing sounds and noise associated with simulated laryngeal elevation and the carotid pulse were acquired at 24 sites on the neck in 14 normal subjects; these signals were acoustically analyzed. The determination of the optimal site for detecting swallowing sounds was based on the signal-to-noise ratio. The site over the lateral border of the trachea immediately inferior to the cricoid cartilage is the optimal site for detection of swallowing sounds because this site showed the greatest signal-to-noise ratio with the smallest variance. The site over the center of the cricoid cartilage and the midpoint between the site over the cent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00262760

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, K., Groher, M., & Michi, K.-I.
Affiliations
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • SHOWA Medical University (JP)
Venue
Dysphagia
Published
1994
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
54-62
ISSN
  • 0179-051X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0460
OpenAlex
W2086464186
Cited by
215
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dysphagia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Keywords
swallowing sounds, pharyngeal swallow, cervical auscultation, acoustic analysis, accelerometer, signal-to-noise ratio, cricoid cartilage, laryngeal elevation, dysphagia
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Acoustics, Adhesives, Adult, Auscultation, Carotid Arteries, Deglutition, Female, Humans, Laryngeal Cartilages, Larynx, Male, Movement, Paper, Pharynx, Plastics, Pulse, Rubber, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sound, Transducers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review