Cited by 79Gender Studies in LanguageGender Roles and Identity StudiesWriting and Handwriting Education

The gender-linked language effect in primary and secondary students' impromptu essays

Mulac, Anthony, Studley, Lisa B., Blau, Sheridan·1990·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00289762

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulac, A., Studley, L. B., & Blau, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
1990-11
Volume
23
Issue
9-10
Pages
439-470
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2061798920
Cited by
79
References
78
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
gender stereotypes, gender differences in writing, student writing, linguistic features, dynamism, aesthetic quality, primary and secondary school students, gender prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review