Cited by 49Vestibular and auditory disordersMotor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Eye movements and vestibulo-ocular reflex in the blind

K�mpf, D., Piper, H.-F.·1987·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

To assess the effect of chronic deprivation of visual feedback, 21 blind patients underwent clinical and electronystagmographical examination. Patients with congenital blindness were characterized by spontaneous eye movements, inability to consciously move the eyes and absence of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), whereas eye movement abnormalities were practically absent in those with blindness acquired late in life. Active visual experience, at least in early life, seems to be crucial for the development of eye movements and VOR adjustment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00314291

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Congenitally blind subjects lack vestibulo-ocular reflexes; such reflexes are present but abnormal in individuals with acquired blindness.

    “Congenitally blind subjects lack vestibulo-ocular reflexes, such reflexes are present but abnormal in individuals with acquired blindness (Kompf and Piper 1987; Leigh and Zee 1980; Sherman and Keller 1986).”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Kompf and Piper 1987

    The Conclusions (p. 5) report total abolition of the VOR in congenitally blind subjects and weakening after long-lasting blindness with prior vision. But the Late acquired blindness section (p. 3) says the VOR was normal in every case, so the claim overgeneralizes abnormal VORs to all acquired blindness. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
K�mpf, D., & Piper, H.-F.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
1987-06
Volume
234
Issue
5
Pages
337-341
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2093020972
Cited by
49
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
eye movements, vestibulo-ocular reflex, blindness, congenital blindness, acquired blindness, visual deprivation, spontaneous eye movements, electronystagmography, visual experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blindness, Child, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Eye Movements, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nystagmus, Physiologic, Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review